Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29745335›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2018

Experimental Drugs for Neuropathic Pain.

Kinga Salat, Beata Gryzlo, Katarzyna Kulig

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Viruses · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. T Cells as Guardians of Pain Resolution.Trends in molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Mechanisms Involved in Superiority of Angiotensin Receptor Blockade over ACE Inhibition in Attenuating Neuropathic Pain Induced in Rats.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kinga SalatFaculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University, 9 Medyczna St., 30-688 Krakow, Poland.
Beata GryzloFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical College. Jagiellonian University, 9 Medyczna 30-688 Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna KuligDepartment of Physicochemical Drug Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University, 9 Medyczna St., 30-688 Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuropathic pain (NP) is an important public health problem and despite recent progress in the understanding, diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms and the treatment of NP, many patients remain refractory to pharmacotherapy.

objectiveCurrently used drugs have limited efficacy and dose-limiting adverse effects, and thus there is a substantial need for further development of novel medications for its treatment. Alternatively, drugs approved for use in diseases other than NP can be applied as experimental for NP conditions. This paper covers advances in the field of NP treatment.

resultsThe prime focus of this paper is on drugs with well-established pharmacological activity whose current therapeutic applications are distinct from NP. These drugs could be a potential novel treatment of NP. Data from preclinical studies and clinical trials on these experimental drugs are presented. The development of advanced methods of genomics enabled to propose new targets for drugs which could be effective in the NP treatment.

conclusionExperimental drugs for NP can be a treatment option which should be tailor-made for each individual on the basis of pain features, previous therapies, associated clinical conditions, recurrence of pain, adverse effects, contraindications and patients' preferences. At present, there are only some agents which may have potential as novel treatments. Increasing knowledge about mechanisms underlying NP, mechanisms of drug action, as well as available data from preclinical and clinical studies make botulinum toxin A, minocycline, ambroxol, statins and PPAR agonists (ATx086001) promising potential future treatment options.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsHumansNeuralgiaAnalgesics3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductaseadrenergic β2 receptors agonistshistamine H3 receptorsNeuropathic painp38 mitogen-activated protein kinasereactive oxygen species.TRPA1 channelsT-type calcium channels

Identifiers

PMID29745335
PMCPMC6187752
OpenAlexW2802270448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.