Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744900›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2018

Pharmacokinetics and safety of fluconazole and micafungin in neonates with systemic candidiasis: a randomized, open-label clinical trial.

S Leroux, E Jacqz-Aigrain, V Elie, F Legrand, C Barin-Le Guellec, B Aurich, V Biran, B Dusang, S Goudjil, S Coopman and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02145832 (Fluconazole Versus Micafungin in Neonates With Suspected or Culture-proven Candidiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02145832 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Fluconazole Versus Micafungin in Neonates With Suspected or Culture-proven Candidiasis: a Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study (TINN Project - Treat Infections iN Neonates)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2014 to 2015Enrolled100ConditionsCandidiasisArmsFluconazole, Micafungin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Challenges in conducting paediatric trials with off-patent drugs.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review of Fluconazole Treatment and Prophylaxis for Invasive Candidiasis in Neonates.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Review
  19. Advances in the Treatment of Mycoses in Pediatric Patients.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

S LerouxDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Clinical Investigation Center 1426 Robert-Debré Paediatric Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
E Jacqz-AigrainDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Clinical Investigation Center 1426 Robert-Debré Paediatric Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4285-7067
V Elie
F LegrandDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Clinical Investigation Center 1426 Robert-Debré Paediatric Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
C Barin-Le GuellecEA4245, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France.
B AurichDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Clinical Investigation Center 1426 Robert-Debré Paediatric Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
V BiranUMR 1141 INSERM, Université Paris 7-Diderot, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Robert-Debré Paediatric Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
B DusangNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, CHU de La Réunion, Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France.
S GoudjilNeonatal Care Unit, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France.
S CoopmanCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CIC1403, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
R Garcia SanchezHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Spain.
W ZhaoDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Clinical Investigation Center 1426 Robert-Debré Paediatric Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
P ManzoniNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
FP7 TINN (Treat Infections in NeoNates) consortium
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion · FRComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESInserm · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe pharmacokinetics (PK) of fluconazole and micafungin differ in neonates compared with children and adults. Dosing instructions in product labels appear to be inconsistent with the emerging scientific evidence. Limited information is available on the safety profile of these agents in neonates. Our objective was to study the population PK and safety of both drugs, randomly administered in neonates with suspected or confirmed systemic candidiasis.

methodsNeonates were randomized 1:1 to fluconazole (loading dose 25 mg kg

resultsThirty-six neonates were enrolled. The median (range) gestational age was 28.2 (24.1-40.1) and 26.8 (23.5-40.0) weeks for fluconazole and micafungin, respectively. Based on 163 PK samples, the median population clearance (l h

conclusionBased on Monte Carlo simulations, a loading dose for fluconazole and dosing higher than recommended for both drugs are required to increase the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve target attainment rate in neonates.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveCandidiasisFemaleFluconazoleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMicafunginMiceProspective StudiesAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleMicafunginCandida sppfluconazolemicafunginneonatepharmacokineticssafety

Identifiers

PMID29744900
PMCPMC6089805
OpenAlexW2800281687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.