Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744792›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

Development and psychometrics of a short-form pharmaceutical care-specific measure for quality of life.

Phantipa Sakthong, Nontapat Sonsa-Ardjit, Pattarin Sukarnjanaset, Wipaporn Munpan, Todsaporn Sangthonganotai

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development and psychometric validation of the short-form thai version of the spine oncology study group outcomes questionnaire (TH-SOSGOQ-8D).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phantipa SakthongDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Phyathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. phantipa.s@pharm.chula.ac.th.
Nontapat Sonsa-ArdjitPharmacy Unit, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pattarin SukarnjanasetDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Wipaporn MunpanPharmacy Unit, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Todsaporn SangthonganotaiPharmacy Unit, Klang Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

Thailand Research Fund RSA 5580035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The validated patient-reported outcomes measure of pharmaceutical therapy for quality of life (PROMPT-QoL) contains 43-items, and can be too lengthy for some applications. Objectives To develop a brief version called the PROMPT, and test its psychometric properties. Setting Four public hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand. Method Secondary analysis of three databases used to develop and evaluate the original PROMPT-QoL. Items for the short-form PROMPT were selected based on expert and patient evaluations of content and importance, and lack of redundancy. All domains of the original version are represented in the PROMPT. Main outcome measures Psychometric properties (internal consistency and test-retest reliability, criterion, convergent and discriminant validity, and responsiveness), and indicators of practicality (e.g., administration time, missing data). Results Analyses of the PROMPT and its domain subscales demonstrated good internal consistency and fair-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Correlations between the original and short-form, overall and by domain, were high. Expectations for convergent and discriminant validity were met as correlations between the PROMPT and generic health-related quality of life measures (WHOQoL-BREF domains and summary scores of the SF-12v2) were modest (< 0.40). Based on data from a trial of pharmaceutical care, the PROMPT short-form was very responsive to reductions in medication related problems. Administration time for the PROMPT is estimated to be about 5 min, and across all datasets used, no missing data were found amongst the 16 items of the PROMPT. Conclusion The 16-item PROMPT appears to be a practical, reliable, valid, and responsive instrument to identify patient's drug-related needs and to assess the humanistic impact of patient-centered pharmaceutical care.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedDrug TherapyFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePharmaceutical ServicesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsThailandPatient-reported outcomesPharmaceutical carePROMPT-QOLPsychometricsQuality of lifeThailand

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.