Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744790›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

Comparative efficacy of antiepileptic drugs for patients with generalized epileptic seizures: systematic review and network meta-analyses.

Marília Silveira de Almeida Campos, Lorena Rocha Ayres, Manuela Roque Siane Morelo, Fabiana Angelo Marques Carizio, Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cerebellar Degeneration in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Evaluation of the management of high-risk obstetric patients living with epilepsy: A retrospective study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Empagliflozin Mitigates PTZ-Induced Seizures in Rats: Modulating Npas4 and CREB-BDNF Signaling Pathway.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Understanding Lamotrigine's Role in the CNS and Possible Future Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Our reasons for converting to valproic acid treatment in female patients with genetic generalized epilepsy: a retrospective, single-centre study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marília Silveira de Almeida CamposSchool of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. mariliac@fcfrp.usp.br.
Lorena Rocha AyresDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Manuela Roque Siane MoreloSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Fabiana Angelo Marques CarizioSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo Régis Leira PereiraSchool of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Valproate is a widely prescribed antiepileptic drug for generalized epilepsies, due to the extensive knowledge on its efficacy since it is on the market for many decades. However, a large number of new antiepileptic medicines was introduced into clinical practice and may be better options for treatment, considering that these medicines differ in terms of efficacy spectrum. Despite extensive research, questions regarding which medicine would constitute the first option for the monotherapy treatment of generalized epilepsy remain. Aim of the Review To compare the relative efficacy of all available antiepileptic drugs in the monotherapy treatment of generalized epileptic seizures; and also to compare all antiepoileptig drugs with valproate, which is the current first-line treatment for generalized epilepsy. Methods A systematic review for randomized controlled clinical trials was performed. Network meta-analyses used Bayesian random effects model. Sensitivity analyses determined the results´ robustness. The relative probability of two efficacy outcomes ("Seizure free" and "Therapeutic inefficacy") to happen for each medcicine was calculated using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve. Results Seven papers (1809 patients) studied the efficacy of valproate, lamotrigine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, topiramate, levetiracetam, and phenobarbital in the treatment of generalized tonicclonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Phenytoin demonstrated to be inferior to valproate in leaving the patient free of these seizures types [OR: 0.50 (95% CrI 0.27, 0.87)]. Lamotrigine (61%) showed the highest probability of presenting the outcome "Seizure free", followed by levetiracetam (47%), topiramate (44%), and valproate (38%) in the treatment of generalized tonic-clonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Meanwhile, valproate exhibited greater chance of presenting the outcome "Therapeutic inefficacy" (62%). Regarding absence seizures itself, there was no difference in the efficacy of lamotrigine and ethosuximide when compared to valproate. However, the ranking indicates that ethosuximide (52%) and valproate (47%) are both more likely than lamotrigine to keep the patient free of seizures. Conclusions Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate are as effective as valproate for treating generalized tonic-clonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Meanwhile, valproate and ethosuximide are the best options for the treatment of absence seizures promoting better control of seizures, which is the primary goal of pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsy, GeneralizedValproic AcidBayes TheoremHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsValproic AcidAnticonvulsantsBayes theoremGeneralized epilepsyLiterature reviewMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID29744790
OpenAlexW2802002658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.