Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744787›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2018

ADA Deficiency: Evaluation of the Clinical and Laboratory Features and the Outcome.

Deniz Cagdas, Pınar Gur Cetinkaya, Betül Karaatmaca, Saliha Esenboga, Cagman Tan, Togay Yılmaz, Ersin Gümüş, Safa Barış, Barış Kuşkonmaz, Tuba Turul Ozgur and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Deniz CagdasDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. cagdasdenizna@yahoo.com.
Pınar Gur CetinkayaDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Betül KaraatmacaDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Saliha EsenbogaDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cagman TanDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Togay YılmazHacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Ersin GümüşDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Safa BarışDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Marmara University Medical School, İstanbul, Turkey.
Barış KuşkonmazDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Tuba Turul OzgurDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Pawan BaliDuke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Ines SantistebanDuke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Diclehan OrhanDepartment of Pediatric Pathology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Aysel YüceDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Duygu CetinkayaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Kaan BoztugCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Michael HershfieldDuke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Ozden SanalDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
İlhan TezcanDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hacettepe University Medical School, İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University Hospital · TRHacettepe University · TRDuke Medical Center · USCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine · ATMarmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency is an autosomal recessive primary immunodeficiency. It results in the intracellular accumulation of toxic metabolites which have effects particularly on lymphocytes and the brain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 13 ADA-deficient patients. We planned to evaluate their clinical and laboratory findings before and after enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), and hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy (HSCGT).

methodsMeasurement of ADA enzyme activity and metabolites and sequencing of the ADA gene were performed in most of the patients with ADA deficiency. One of the patients with late-onset ADA deficiency was diagnosed by the help of primary immunodeficiency panel screening.

resultsTen out of 13 patients were diagnosed as SCID, while 3 out of 13 were diagnosed as delayed-/late-onset ADA deficiency. Late-onset ADA deficiency patients had clinical and laboratory findings of combined immunodeficiency (CID). Eight patients with ADA-SCID were found to have higher levels of ADA metabolite (dAXP%) (62.1% (34.6-71.9)) than 3 patients with delayed-/late-onset ADA deficiency (6.9% (2.1-8.9). All but one patient with SCID had T-B-NK- phenotype, one had T-B-NK+ phenotype. Genetic defect was documented in 11 patients. Four out of 11 patients had compound heterozygous defects. Three out of 4 patients with compound heterozygous defects had delayed-onset/late-onset ADA deficiency. Seven out of 11 patients with SCID had homozygous defects. Five out of 7 had the same homozygous indel frameshift mutation (c.955-959delGAAGA) showing a founder effect. There were two novel splice site defects: one (IVS10+2T>C) was heterozygous in a patient with late-onset ADA deficiency, and the other was homozygous (IVS2delT+2) in a SCID patient. Other defects were missense defects. Nine out of 13 patients were put on pegylated ADA ERT. Four out of six patients were transplanted without using a conditioning regimen. HSCGT was performed to one of the patients.

conclusionThe genetic diagnosis of SCID is utmost important. There is a chance to give ERT before the definitive therapy if the patient with SCID/CID has ADA deficiency. Although ERT was insufficient to restore a normal immune function in ADA-SCID patients, it was useful to improve and stabilize the clinical status before curative therapy (aHSCT/HSCGT). Enzyme replacement therapy was successful in patients with late-/delayed-onset ADA deficiency who presented with the features of combined immunodeficiency. Gastrointestinal polyposis in a patient with late-onset ADA deficiency may be an association or a coincidental finding. Intermittent neurodevelopmental evaluation especially for hearing impairment should be performed in most of the ADA-deficient patients. This may alleviate the speech delay and cognitive abnormalities which may be observed in the follow-up.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesAdenosine DeaminaseAgammaglobulinemiaAge of OnsetBiomarkersBiopsyDisease ManagementEnzyme ActivationEnzyme Replacement TherapyFemaleGenetic TestingGenetic TherapyGenotypeHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHomozygoteHumansAdenosine DeaminaseBiomarkersADA enzyme replacement therapyLate-onset adenosine deaminase deficiencySCID

Identifiers

PMID29744787
OpenAlexW2799502029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.