Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744764›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Analytical performance of a platform for point-of-care CRP testing in adults consulting for lower respiratory tract infection in primary care.

Veerle Matheeussen, Viviane Van Hoof, Katherine Loens, Christine Lammens, Anouk Vanderstraeten, Samuel Coenen, Chris C Butler, Paul Little, Theo J M Verheij, Herman Goossens and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Veerle MatheeussenDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. veerle.matheeussen@uza.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-3643
Viviane Van HoofDepartment of Biochemistry, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Katherine LoensDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Christine LammensDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Anouk VanderstraetenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Samuel CoenenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Chris C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Paul LittleUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Theo J M VerheijJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Herman GoossensDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Margareta IevenDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
GRACE consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biomarker widely used for disease severity assessment and treatment of inflammatory conditions. Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices should ideally be rapid and provide similar results to standard tests done in laboratories. Two thousand nine hundred twenty-two serum samples were obtained from adult patients presenting to primary care with symptoms of lower respiratory infection in a European diagnostic study. The analytic performance of the CRP QuikRead POCT device (Orion Diagnostica) was evaluated by comparing results with a central laboratory method (Dimension Vista, Siemens), with both tests performed in a laboratory setting. For a CRP cut-off concentration of ≥ 30 mg/L, the QuikRead test had a sensitivity of 92.2%, and specificity of 99.4%. The mean difference between the QuikRead and the central lab test was 0.4 mg/L. The slope of the Passing-Bablok regression was 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.95) indicating an underestimation of CRP levels of 6% by QuikRead. CRP estimates obtained from the QuikRead test correlate well with a central laboratory assay and the measurement displays low inter-assay variation. Therefore, the QuikRead test is a good candidate for CRP testing in primary care.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory Tract InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinBedside testC-reactive proteinPoint-of-care testRapid testRespiratory infection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.