ArticleBioactive materials2017
3D additive-manufactured nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds: Effect of the application mode of a time-dependent magnetic field on hMSCs behavior.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Static Scaffolds to Responsive Implants: 3D-Printed Field-Active Bioceramics for Adaptive Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Smart Multi-Responsive Biomaterials and Their Applications for 4D Bioprinting.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- An integrated design strategy coupling additive manufacturing and matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation (MAPLE) towards the development of a new concept 3D scaffold with improved properties for tissue regeneration.Nanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Bone Regeneration Revolution: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Modulates Macrophage-Derived Exosomes to Attenuate Osteoclastogenesis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Resorbable GBR Scaffolds in Oral and Maxillofacial Tissue Engineering: Design, Fabrication, and Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Genipin versus Ferric Chloride cross-linked unmodified Gum Arabic/Chitosan/nano-Hydroxyapatite nanocomposite hydrogels as potential scaffolds for bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A review on the effect of nanocomposite scaffolds reinforced with magnetic nanoparticles in osteogenesis and healing of bone injuries.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Three-dimensional printing of smart constructs using stimuli-responsive biomaterials: A future direction of precision medicine.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- 3D Plotting of Calcium Phosphate Cement and Melt Electrowriting of Polycaprolactone Microfibers in One Scaffold: A Hybrid Additive Manufacturing Process.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study.Membranes · 2022Article
- The Effect of Whitlockite as an Osteoconductive Synthetic Bone Substitute Material in Animal Bony Defect Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Surface Functionalization of Poly(l-lactide-Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Impact of Magnetic Stimulation on Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Review
- Magnetic stimulation of the angiogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells in vascular tissue engineering.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2021Article
- Evidence of Modular Responsiveness of Osteoblast-Like Cells Exposed to Hydroxyapatite-Containing Magnetic Nanostructures.Biology · 2020Article
- Combination Design of Time-Dependent Magnetic Field and Magnetic Nanocomposites to Guide Cell Behavior.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Nanotechnology Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- 3D Superparamagnetic Scaffolds for Bone Mineralization under Static Magnetic Field Stimulation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few years, the influence of static or dynamic magnetic fields on biological systems has become a topic of considerable interest. Magnetism has recently been implicated to play significant roles in the regulation of cell responses and, for this reason, it is revolutionizing many aspects of healthcare, also suggesting new opportunities in tissue engineering. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of the application mode of a time-dependent magnetic field on the behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) seeded on 3D additive-manufactured poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/iron-doped hydroxyapatite (PCL/FeHA) nanocomposite scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.