Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744395›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2016

Enhancing cell infiltration of electrospun fibrous scaffolds in tissue regeneration.

Jinglei Wu, Yi Hong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 260 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hydrogel Design to Understand and Guide 3D Cell Migration.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinglei WuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Yi HongDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
The University of Texas at Arlington · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospinning is one of the most effective approaches to fabricate tissue-engineered scaffolds composed of nano-to sub-microscale fibers that simulate a native extracellular matrix. However, one major concern about electrospun scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration is that their small pores defined by densely compacted fibers markedly hinder cell infiltration and tissue ingrowth. To address this problem, researchers have developed and investigated various methods of manipulating scaffold structures to increase pore size or loosen the scaffold. These methods involve the use of physical treatments, such as salt leaching, gas foaming and custom-made collectors, and combined techniques to obtain electrospun scaffolds with loose fibrous structures and large pores. This article provides a summary of these motivating electrospinning techniques to enhance cell infiltration of electrospun scaffolds, which may inspire new electrospinning techniques and their new biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Cell infiltrationElectrospinningPorosity controlScaffoldsTissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID29744395
PMCPMC5883964
OpenAlexW2482599381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.