Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744363›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2018

Peer Inclusion in Interventions for Children with ADHD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reinie Cordier, Brandon Vilaysack, Kenji Doma, Sarah Wilkes-Gillan, Renée Speyer

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Reinie CordierSchool of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-5300
Brandon VilaysackCollege of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
Kenji DomaCollege of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
Sarah Wilkes-GillanSchool of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, P.O. Box 968, North Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia.
Renée SpeyerSchool of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.
James Cook University · AUAustralian Catholic University · AUCurtin University · AULeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of peer inclusion in interventions to improve the social functioning of children with ADHD.

methodsWe searched four electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and controlled quasi-experimental studies that investigated peer inclusion interventions alone or combined with pharmacological treatment. Data were collected from the included studies and methodologically assessed. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model.

resultsSeventeen studies met eligibility criteria. Studies investigated interventions consisting of peer involvement and peer proximity; no study included peer mediation. Most included studies had an unclear or high risk of bias regarding inadequate reporting of randomization, blinding, and control for confounders. Meta-analyses indicated improvements in pre-post measures of social functioning for participants in peer-inclusive treatment groups. Peer inclusion was advantageous compared to treatment as usual. The benefits of peer inclusion over other therapies or medication only could not be determined. Using parents as raters for outcome measurement significantly mediated the intervention effect.

conclusionsThe evidence to support or contest the efficacy of peer inclusion interventions for children with ADHD is lacking. Future studies need to reduce risks of bias, use appropriate sample sizes, and provide detailed results to investigate the efficacy of peer inclusion interventions for children with ADHD.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildHumansParentsPeer GroupRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29744363
PMCPMC5878915
OpenAlexW2793244291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.