ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research
Dissemination of Multidrug-Resistant, Class I and II Integrons and Molecular Typing of CTX-M-producing
Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Analysis, Population Structure, and Characterisation of Multidrug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Extensively-Drug ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
- Correlation of quinolone-resistance,Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2019Article
- Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Understanding the Epidemiology of Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in the Middle East Using a One Health Approach.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMETHODOLOGY: One hundred isolates of
resultsMDR phenotype was observed in 56% of isolates. The 40% of isolates were ESBL positive and 35 isolates contained
conclusionsThe study findings highlight the concern of circulating MDR strains of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.