ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2018
Readability of information on colonoscopy preparation on the internet.
Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Readability of Skin Cancer Screening Resources: A Comparison of Online Websites and ChatGPT Responses.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- A Readability Analysis of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Assessing the Readability of Online Health Information for Colonoscopy - Analysis of Articles in 22 European Languages.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Quality indicators of colonoscopy care: a qualitative study from the perspectives of colonoscopy participants and nurses.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The Quality of Infectious Disease Hospital Websites in Poland in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Readability of online patient-based information on bariatric surgery.Health promotion perspectives · 2019Article
- Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study.American journal of men's health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.