ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2018
Chinese Mobile Health APPs for Hypertension Management: A Systematic Evaluation of Usefulness.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of an mHealth App to Support Patients' Self-Management of Hypertension: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Mobile health applications for the management of primary hypertension: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.Medicine · 2020Trial
- A Nudge Theory-Based Mobile Health Intervention for Self-Management in Young and Middle-Aged Patients With Hypertension: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Self-Management Combined With Digital Health Interventions to Improve Dietary Behavior, Exercise Behavior, Stress Management Behavior, and Blood Pressure Among Thais With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Protocol for an Explanatory Sequential Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions in improving hypertensive outcomes among patients with uncontrolled hypertension: A systematic review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
- Establishing an Evaluation Indicator System for User Satisfaction With Hypertension Management Apps: Combining User-Generated Content and Analytic Hierarchy Process.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Construction and application of procedural pathways combined with information management in nursing staff skills training system.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Mining User Reviews From Hypertension Management Mobile Health Apps to Explore Factors Influencing User Satisfaction and Their Asymmetry: Comparative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- A scale to measure the perceived quality of mHealth by elderly patients with hypertension in China.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Scoping review: Development and assessment of evaluation frameworks of mobile health apps for recommendations to consumers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Article
- An Iterative and Collaborative End-to-End Methodology Applied to Digital Mental Health.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of different hypertension management strategies in a community setting.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020Article
- How Do Patients with Chronic Diseases Make Usage Decisions regarding Mobile Health Monitoring Service?Journal of healthcare engineering · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze and compare the usefulness of hypertension management APPs released in the Chinese market; to understand the general situations, characteristics, problems, and trends in hypertension management mHealth APPs; and to identify the gaps between mainland China products and non-mainland China products with the aim to provide recommendations for developers in industry and assist hypertensive patients in selecting suitable APPs. Methods: The hypertension management APPs available by October 2016 in China were analyzed from the perspective of data items and function usefulness. Sample sets were determined through PRISMA. An evaluation item set was developed based on the usability framework of TURF and the Results: Among the 73 Chinese-supported APPs, none of the hypertension management APPs could fully cover the usefulness item set (mean = 37.4%). Regarding the use of mobile terminal hardware, only cameras and positioning sensors are commonly used in information collection. Regarding the data items and services provided, the most commonly collected data are "demographic information" (88% versus 100%) and "vital signs" (76% versus 100%), but APPs developed in mainland China and non-mainland China provided significantly different services and profit-making patterns. Regarding data security and privacy protection, the APPs from mainland China provided far lower usefulness (31% versus 56%). Conclusions: mHealth APPs can promptly and efficiently acquire sign-related data by improving the professionality and scientificity of data about healthy living habits. APPs also improve the preventive usefulness of the collected data and bring about new opportunities for the management and control of hypertension. Other important research trends include privacy protection and data security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.