Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29744011›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal

Noninvasive Evaluation of Symptomatic Women with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Mohammed A Chamsi-Pasha, Karla M Kurrelmeyer

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammed A Chamsi-PashaMETHODIST DEBAKEY HEART & VASCULAR CENTER, HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL, HOUSTON, TEXAS.
Karla M KurrelmeyerMETHODIST DEBAKEY HEART & VASCULAR CENTER, HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL, HOUSTON, TEXAS.
Houston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States, yet several factors make it challenging to diagnose in women. Although women have more frequent chest pain than men, atypical symptoms such as nausea, dyspnea, and fatigue make it difficult to determine their risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) before testing. Current guidelines recommend exercise electrocardiography (ex-ECG) as the initial test in symptomatic women with intermediate pretest probability who can exercise and have a normal resting ECG; however, treadmill ex-ECG testing has a significantly lower positive predictive value in women. In addition, women often have nonobstructive CAD in conjunction with microvascular dysfunction and other cardiovascular abnormalities that can decrease the accuracy of all noninvasive tests. The following provides an overview of exercise ECG, echocardiography, SPECT imaging, and various other available modalities and examines their effectiveness in diagnosing and managing symptomatic women with suspected CAD.

Indexed as

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesWomen's HealthCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSex Factorscoronary artery diseaseexercise ECGischemic heart diseasestress testwomen

Identifiers

PMID29744011
PMCPMC5935278
OpenAlexW2947977076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.