ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2017
A MIXED-EFFECTS MODEL FOR INCOMPLETE DATA FROM LABELING-BASED QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMICS EXPERIMENTS.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- AUGMENTED DOUBLY ROBUST POST-IMPUTATION INFERENCE FOR PROTEOMIC DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- AUGMENTED DOUBLY ROBUST POST-IMPUTATION INFERENCE FOR PROTEOMIC DATA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identifying candidate genes and drug targets for Alzheimer's disease by an integrative network approach using genetic and brain region-specific proteomic data.Human molecular genetics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022Article
- Estimating and accounting for unobserved covariates in high-dimensional correlated data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022Article
- Assessment of TMT Labeling Efficiency in Large-Scale Quantitative Proteomics: The Critical Effect of Sample pH.ACS omega · 2021Article
- ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE IN METABOLOMICS WITH NON-RANDOM MISSING DATA AND LATENT FACTORS.The annals of applied statistics · 2020Article
- Using multivariate mixed-effects selection models for analyzing batch-processed proteomics data with non-ignorable missingness.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Integrative Proteo-genomic Analysis to Construct CNA-protein Regulatory Map in Breast and Ovarian Tumors.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer's disease.Scientific data · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In mass spectrometry (MS) based quantitative proteomics research, the emerging iTRAQ (isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation) and TMT (tandem mass tags) techniques have been widely adopted for high throughput protein profiling. In a typical iTRAQ/TMT proteomics study, samples are grouped into batches, and each batch is processed by one multiplex experiment, in which the abundances of thousands of proteins/peptides in a batch of samples can be measured simultaneously. The multiplex labeling technique greatly enhances the throughput of protein quantification. However, the technical variation across different iTRAQ/TMT multiplex experiments is often large due to the dynamic nature of MS instruments. This leads to strong batch effects in the iTRAQ/TMT data. Moreover, the iTRAQ/TMT data often contain substantial batch-level nonignorable missing entries. Specifically, the abundance measures of a given protein/peptide are often either observed or missing altogether in all the samples from the same batch, with the missing probability depending on the combined batch-level abundances. We term this unique missing-data mechanism as the Batch-level Abundance-Dependent Missing-data Mechanism (BADMM). We introduce a new method- mixEMM-for analyzing iTRAQ/TMT data with batch effects and batch-level nonignorable missingness. The mixEMM method employs a linear mixed-effects model and explicitly models the batch effects and the BADMM. With simulation studies, we showed that, compared with existing approaches that utilize relative abundances and ignore the missing batches under the missing-completely-at-random assumption, the mixEMM method achieves more accurate parameter estimation and inference. We applied the method to an iTRAQ proteomics data from a breast cancer study and identified phosphopeptides differentially expressed between different breast cancer subtypes. The method can be applied to general clustered data with cluster-level nonignorable missing-data mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.