Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29743956›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2018

Molecular cytogenetic identification of three rust-resistant wheat-

Yanru Pei, Yu Cui, Yanping Zhang, Honggang Wang, Yinguang Bao, Xingfeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular characterization of a new wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum translocation line with resistance to stripe rust.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characterization and Evaluation of Resistance to Powdery Mildew of Wheat-International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of new cytogenetic markers forComparative cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yanru PeiState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agriculture University, Tai'an, 271018 Shandong China.
Yu CuiState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agriculture University, Tai'an, 271018 Shandong China.
Yanping ZhangCollege of Agronomy, Shandong Agriculture University, Tai'an, 271018 Shandong China.
Honggang WangState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agriculture University, Tai'an, 271018 Shandong China.
Yinguang BaoCollege of Agronomy, Shandong Agriculture University, Tai'an, 271018 Shandong China.
Xingfeng LiState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agriculture University, Tai'an, 271018 Shandong China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

resultsIn this study, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), multicolor GISH (mcGISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to analyze the genomic constitution of SN0389, SN0398 and SN0406, three octoploid accessions with good resistance to rust. The results demonstrated that the three octoploids possessed 42 wheat chromosomes, while SN0389 contained 12

conclusionsThe results indicated that these wheat-

Indexed as

Common wheatIn situ hybridizationLeaf rustPartial amphiploidsStripe rustThinopyrum ponticum

Identifiers

PMID29743956
PMCPMC5930962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.