Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29743953›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2018

Complete genome sequence and the expression pattern of plasmids of the model ethanologen

Shihui Yang, Jessica M Vera, Jeff Grass, Giannis Savvakis, Oleg V Moskvin, Yongfu Yang, Sean J McIlwain, Yucai Lyu, Irene Zinonos, Alexander S Hebert and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering ethanologenic bacteriumSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Metabolic engineering of an industrial bacteriumSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Systematic metabolic engineering ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Regulation of biofilm formation inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shihui Yang *1Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Green Transformation of Bio-resources, Environmental Microbial Technology Center of Hubei Province, Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062 China.ORCID 0000-0002-9394-9148
Jessica M Vera *3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Jeff Grass3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Giannis Savvakis4Department of Genetics & Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Panepistimiopolis, 15701 Athens, Greece.
Oleg V Moskvin3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Yongfu Yang1Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Green Transformation of Bio-resources, Environmental Microbial Technology Center of Hubei Province, Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062 China.
Sean J McIlwain3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Yucai Lyu3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Irene Zinonos4Department of Genetics & Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Panepistimiopolis, 15701 Athens, Greece.
Alexander S Hebert3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Joshua J Coon3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Donna M Bates3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Trey K Sato3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Steven D Brown5DOE-BioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.
Michael E Himmel7DOE-Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Min Zhang2DOE-National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Robert Landick3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Katherine M Pappas4Department of Genetics & Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Panepistimiopolis, 15701 Athens, Greece.
Yaoping Zhang *3DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

resultsIn this study, we determined the complete chromosome and plasmid sequences of ZM4 and its engineered xylose-utilizing derivatives 2032 and 8b. Compared to previously published and revised ZM4 chromosome sequences, the ZM4 chromosome sequence reported here contains 65 nucleotide sequence variations as well as a 2400-bp insertion. Four plasmids were identified in all three strains, with 150 plasmid genes predicted in strain ZM4 and 2032, and 153 plasmid genes predicted in strain 8b due to the insertion of heterologous DNA for expanded substrate utilization. Plasmid genes were then annotated using Blast2GO, InterProScan, and systems biology data analyses, and most genes were found to have apparent orthologs in other organisms or identifiable conserved domains. To verify plasmid gene prediction, RNA-Seq was used to map transcripts and also compare relative gene expression under various growth conditions, including anaerobic and aerobic conditions, or growth in different concentrations of biomass hydrolysates. Overall, plasmid genes were more responsive to varying hydrolysate concentrations than to oxygen availability. Additionally, our results indicated that although all plasmids were present in low copy number (about 1-2 per cell), the copy number of some plasmids varied under specific growth conditions or due to heterologous gene insertion.

conclusionsThe complete genome of ZM4 and two xylose-utilizing derivatives is reported in this study, with an emphasis on identifying and characterizing plasmid genes. Plasmid gene annotation, validation, expression levels at growth conditions of interest, and contribution to host fitness are reported for the first time.

Indexed as

AnnotationCopy numberFermentationGenomeGenome resequencingHydrolysatePlasmidRNA-SeqZymomonas mobilis

Identifiers

PMID29743953
PMCPMC5930841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.