Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29743938›Full record

ArticleBioPsychoSocial medicine2018

Dysbiotic drift and biopsychosocial medicine: how the microbiome links personal, public and planetary health.

Susan L Prescott, Ganesa Wegienka, Alan C Logan, David L Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioPsychoSocial medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vitality Revisited: The Evolving Concept of Flourishing and Its Relevance to Personal and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Epidemiologic and Clinical Features ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Earth Dreams: Reimagining ARPA for Health of People, Places and Planet.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A butterfly flaps its wings: Extinction of biological experience and the origins of allergy.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020
    Review
  17. Molecular Decolonization: An Indigenous Microcosm Perspective of Planetary Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan L Prescott1School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Princess Margaret Hospital, PO Box D184, Perth, WA 6001 Australia.
Ganesa Wegienka2Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202 USA.
Alan C Loganin-VIVO, Research Group of the Worldwide Universities Network (WUN), 6010 Park Ave, Suite #4081, West New York, NJ 07093 USA.
David L Katz4Prevention Research Center, Yale University, Griffin Hospital, 130 Division St, Derby, CT 06418 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emerging concept of planetary health emphasizes that the health of human civilization is intricately connected to the health of natural systems within the Earth's biosphere; here, we focus on the rapidly progressing microbiome science - the microbiota-mental health research in particular - as a way to illustrate the pathways by which exposure to biodiversity supports health. Microbiome science is illuminating the ways in which stress, socioeconomic disadvantage and social polices interact with lifestyle and behaviour to influence the micro and macro-level biodiversity that otherwise mediates health. Although the unfolding microbiome and mental health research is dominated by optimism in biomedical solutions (e.g. probiotics, prebiotics), we focus on the upstream psychosocial and ecological factors implicated in dysbiosis; we connect grand scale biodiversity in the external environment with differences in human-associated microbiota, and, by extension, differences in immune function and mental outlook. We argue that the success of planetary health as a new concept will be strengthened by a more sophisticated understanding of the ways in which individuals develop emotional connections to nature (nature relatedness) and the social policies and practices which facilitate or inhibit the pro-environmental values that otherwise support personal, public and planetary health.

Indexed as

DysbiosisEcologyHealth disparitiesMicrobiomeNatural environmentsNon-communicable diseases

Identifiers

PMID29743938
PMCPMC5932796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.