Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29743827›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2018

The effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on performance, biochemical and psychophysiological variables during a cycling time trial: a crossover randomized trial.

Amanda M J Ferreira, Luiz F Farias-Junior, Thaynan A A Mota, Hassan M Elsangedy, Aline Marcadenti, Telma M A M Lemos, Alexandre H Okano, Ana P T Fayh

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fed, not fasted: is carbohydrate mouth rinsing still ergogenic? A three-level meta-analysis.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda M J Ferreira1Graduate Progrtam in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Avenida senador Salgado Filho 3000, Campus Universitário, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN Brazil.
Luiz F Farias-Junior1Graduate Progrtam in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Avenida senador Salgado Filho 3000, Campus Universitário, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN Brazil.
Thaynan A A Mota1Graduate Progrtam in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Avenida senador Salgado Filho 3000, Campus Universitário, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN Brazil.
Hassan M Elsangedy1Graduate Progrtam in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Avenida senador Salgado Filho 3000, Campus Universitário, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN Brazil.
Aline MarcadentiHCor, Institute of Research, Coracao Hospital, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Telma M A M Lemos1Graduate Progrtam in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Avenida senador Salgado Filho 3000, Campus Universitário, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN Brazil.
Alexandre H Okano4UFABC, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana P T Fayh1Graduate Progrtam in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Avenida senador Salgado Filho 3000, Campus Universitário, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRHospital do Coração · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hypothesis of the central effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse (CMR) on performance improvement in a fed state has not been established, and its psychophysiological responses have not yet been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CMR in athletes fed state on performance, biochemical and psychophysiological responses compared to ad libitum water intake.

methodsEleven trained male cyclists completed a randomized, crossover trial, which consisted of a 30 km cycle ergometer at self-selected intensity and in a fed state. Subjects were under random influence of the following interventions: CMR with a 6% unflavored maltodextrin solution; mouth rinsing with a placebo solution (PMR); drinking "ad libitum" (DAL). The time for completion of the test (min), heart rate (bpm) and power (watts), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), affective response, blood glucose (mg/dL) and lactate (mmol/DL), were evaluated before, during and immediately after the test, while insulin (uIL/mL), cortisol (μg/dL) and creatine kinase (U/L) levels were measured before, immediately after the test and 30 min after the test.

resultsTime for completion of the 30 km trial did not differ significantly among CMR, PMR and DAL interventions (means = 54.5 ± 2.9, 54.7 ± 2.9 and 54.5 ± 2.5 min, respectively;

conclusionsIn a fed state, CMR has not caused metabolic changes, and it has not improved physical performance compared to ad libitum water intake, but demonstrated a possible central effect. ReBec registration number: RBR-4vpwkg. Available in http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/?q=RBR-4vpwkg.

Indexed as

AdultAthletic PerformanceBicyclingBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDietary CarbohydratesExercise TestHeart RateHumansMaleMouthwashesPolysaccharidesSports Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesmaltodextrinMouthwashesPolysaccharidesCarbohydrate mouth rinseCyclingExercisePerceived exertionPhysical performance

Identifiers

PMID29743827
PMCPMC5932899
OpenAlexW2801129069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.