ArticleScientific reports2018
Screen and Verification for Transgene Integration Sites in Pigs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Site in theGenes · 2024Article
- Integrating Omics and CRISPR Technology for Identification and Verification of Genomic Safe Harbor Loci in the Chicken Genome.Biological procedures online · 2023Article
- Effect of Microencapsulation Techniques on the Stress Resistance and Biological Activity of Bovine Lactoferricin-Lactoferrampin-EncodingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Validation of reliable safe harbor locus for efficient porcine transgenesis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Article
- Identification of theGenes · 2022Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in strategy at the Rosa26 locus in cattle fetal fibroblasts.PloS one · 2022Article
- Identification of ACTB Gene as a Potential Safe Harbor Locus in Pig Genome.Molecular biotechnology · 2020Article
- Generation of Marker-FreeGenes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient transgene expression in recipient cells constitutes the primary step in gene therapy. However, random integration in host genome comprises too many uncertainties. Our study presents a strategy combining bioinformatics and functional verification to find transgene integration sites in pig genome. Using an in silico approach, we screen out two candidate sites, namely, Pifs302 and Pifs501, located in actively transcribed intergenic regions with low nucleosome formation potential and without potential non-coding RNAs. After CRISPR/Cas9-mediated site-specific integration on Pifs501, we detected high EGFP expression in different pig cell types and ubiquitous EGFP expression in diverse tissues of transgenic pigs without adversely affecting 600 kb neighboring gene expression. Promoters integrated on Pifs501 exhibit hypomethylated modification, which suggest a permissive epigenetic status of this locus. We establish a versatile master cell line on Pifs501, which allows us to achieve site-specific exchange of EGFP to Follistatin with Cre/loxP system conveniently. Through in vitro and in vivo functional assays, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this screening method, and take Pifs501 as a potential site for transgene insertion in pigs. We anticipate that Pifs501 will have useful applications in pig genome engineering, though the identification of genomic safe harbor should over long-term various functional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.