Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29743251›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

How the carnivorous waterwheel plant (

Anna S Westermeier, Renate Sachse, Simon Poppinga, Philipp Vögele, Lubomir Adamec, Thomas Speck, Manfred Bischoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phenolic Secondary Metabolites inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Immunocytochemical Analysis of Bifid Trichomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapid movements in plants.Journal of plant research · 2021
    Review
  18. A Chemometry ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Snapping mechanics of the Venus flytrap (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna S WestermeierPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden (PBG), University of Freiburg, Schänzlestraße 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany anna.westermeier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9281-1254
Renate SachseInstitute for Structural Mechanics (IBB), University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 7, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany sachse@ibb.uni-stuttgart.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-9635
Simon PoppingaPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden (PBG), University of Freiburg, Schänzlestraße 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-9188
Philipp VögelePlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden (PBG), University of Freiburg, Schänzlestraße 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Lubomir AdamecInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic.
Thomas SpeckPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden (PBG), University of Freiburg, Schänzlestraße 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Manfred BischoffInstitute for Structural Mechanics (IBB), University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 7, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1538-4281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fast motion of the snap-traps of the terrestrial Venus flytrap (

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaBiomimeticsCarnivoryComputer SimulationDroseraceaeModels, BiologicalMotionPlant LeavesAldrovandaDionaeafinite-element modelmechanical modellingplant movementreverse biomimetics

Identifiers

PMID29743251
PMCPMC5966589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.