Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29743189›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018

Genomic Prediction Accounting for Genotype by Environment Interaction Offers an Effective Framework for Breeding Simultaneously for Adaptation to an Abiotic Stress and Performance Under Normal Cropping Conditions in Rice.

Manel Ben Hassen, Jérôme Bartholomé, Giampiero Valè, Tuong-Vi Cao, Nourollah Ahmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manel Ben HassenCIRAD-Centre de Coopération International en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UMR AGAP-Unité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Jérôme BartholoméCIRAD-Centre de Coopération International en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UMR AGAP-Unité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes, F-34398 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-3828
Giampiero ValèCREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Center for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Vercelli, 13100, Italy.
Tuong-Vi CaoCIRAD-Centre de Coopération International en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UMR AGAP-Unité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Nourollah AhmadiCIRAD-Centre de Coopération International en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UMR AGAP-Unité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes, F-34398 Montpellier, France nourollah.ahmadi@cirad.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-0072-6285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing rice varieties adapted to alternate wetting and drying water management is crucial for the sustainability of irrigated rice cropping systems. Here we report the first study exploring the feasibility of breeding rice for adaptation to alternate wetting and drying using genomic prediction methods that account for genotype by environment interactions. Two breeding populations (a reference panel of 284 accessions and a progeny population of 97 advanced lines) were evaluated under alternate wetting and drying and continuous flooding management systems. The predictive ability of genomic prediction for response variables (index of relative performance and the slope of the joint regression) and for multi-environment genomic prediction models were compared. For the three traits considered (days to flowering, panicle weight and nitrogen-balance index), significant genotype by environment interactions were observed in both populations. In cross validation, predictive ability for the index was on average lower (0.31) than that of the slope of the joint regression (0.64) whatever the trait considered. Similar results were found for progeny validation. Both cross-validation and progeny validation experiments showed that the performance of multi-environment models predicting unobserved phenotypes of untested entrees was similar to the performance of single environment models with differences in predictive ability ranging from -6-4% depending on the trait and on the statistical model concerned. The predictive ability of multi-environment models predicting unobserved phenotypes of entrees evaluated under both water management systems outperformed single environment models by an average of 30%. Practical implications for breeding rice for adaptation to alternate wetting and drying system are discussed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBreedingGene-Environment InteractionGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypePhenotypeAlgorithmsGenetics, PopulationGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalOryzaReproducibility of ResultsSelection, Geneticalternate wetting and drying (AWD)G×E interactionGenomic SelectionGenPredprogeny predictionriceShared Data Resources

Identifiers

PMID29743189
PMCPMC6027893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.