ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018
Genomic Prediction Accounting for Genotype by Environment Interaction Offers an Effective Framework for Breeding Simultaneously for Adaptation to an Abiotic Stress and Performance Under Normal Cropping Conditions in Rice.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- OptimGS: a dual integrative genomic prediction framework for improving cold stress tolerance in wheat.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Accelerating genetic gain through integrated genomic selection in crop plants.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Genomic prediction accuracy for low hydrogen cyanide selection in fresh cassava roots. Comparative model analysis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Impact of environmental covariates summarization on predictive ability in genomic selection.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Genetic progress in rice yield: preliminary insights from historically released varieties in Sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Performance of phenomic selection in rice: Effects of population size and genotype-environment interactions on predictive ability.PloS one · 2024Article
- Genomic selection for tolerance to aluminum toxicity in a synthetic population of upland rice.PloS one · 2024Article
- Robotized indoor phenotyping allows genomic prediction of adaptive traits in the field.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Optimization of Multi-Generation Multi-location Genomic Prediction Models for Recurrent Genomic Selection in an Upland Rice Population.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Sparse Phenotyping and Haplotype-Based Models for Genomic Prediction in Rice.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Multi-environment Genomic Selection in Rice Elite Breeding Lines.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Genomic selection for salinity tolerance in japonica rice.PloS one · 2023Article
- Crop genomic selection with deep learning and environmental data: A survey.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Genomic Selection: A Tool for Accelerating the Efficiency of Molecular Breeding for Development of Climate-Resilient Crops.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Optimizing predictions in IRRI's rice drought breeding program by leveraging 17 years of historical data and pedigree information.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Impact of early genomic prediction for recurrent selection in an upland rice synthetic population.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Factors Influencing Genomic Prediction Accuracies of Tropical Maize Resistance to Fall Armyworm and Weevils.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Assessing the genetic diversity of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] germplasm collections using phenotypic traits and SNP markers.BMC genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing rice varieties adapted to alternate wetting and drying water management is crucial for the sustainability of irrigated rice cropping systems. Here we report the first study exploring the feasibility of breeding rice for adaptation to alternate wetting and drying using genomic prediction methods that account for genotype by environment interactions. Two breeding populations (a reference panel of 284 accessions and a progeny population of 97 advanced lines) were evaluated under alternate wetting and drying and continuous flooding management systems. The predictive ability of genomic prediction for response variables (index of relative performance and the slope of the joint regression) and for multi-environment genomic prediction models were compared. For the three traits considered (days to flowering, panicle weight and nitrogen-balance index), significant genotype by environment interactions were observed in both populations. In cross validation, predictive ability for the index was on average lower (0.31) than that of the slope of the joint regression (0.64) whatever the trait considered. Similar results were found for progeny validation. Both cross-validation and progeny validation experiments showed that the performance of multi-environment models predicting unobserved phenotypes of untested entrees was similar to the performance of single environment models with differences in predictive ability ranging from -6-4% depending on the trait and on the statistical model concerned. The predictive ability of multi-environment models predicting unobserved phenotypes of entrees evaluated under both water management systems outperformed single environment models by an average of 30%. Practical implications for breeding rice for adaptation to alternate wetting and drying system are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.