ArticleGenetics2018
Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
Article in Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic analysis of breed composition and population structure in Montana composite cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Influence of genomic retained heterosis on lactation persistence and tropical resilience: leveraging joint-model GWAS to quantify non-additive variance in India's Karan Fries population.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- polyGBLUP: a modified genomic best linear unbiased prediction improved the genomic prediction efficiency for autopolyploid species.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Investigating the impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of variance components and genomic predictions for heat tolerance and performance traits in crossbred and purebred pig populations.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Complex traits and candidate genes: estimation of genetic variance components across multiple genetic architectures.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Atlantic salmon (Conservation physiology · 2023Article
- Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Life-history genotype explains variation in migration activity in Atlantic salmon (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction Methods Accounting for Nonadditive Genetic Effects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genomic mating in outbred species: predicting cross usefulness with additive and total genetic covariance matrices.Genetics · 2021Article
- Optimum mating designs for exploiting dominance in genomic selection schemes for aquaculture species.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Vector space algebra for scaling and centering relationship matrices under non-Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium conditions.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Joint modeling of eQTLs and parent-of-origin effects using an orthogonal framework with RNA-seq data.Human genetics · 2020Article
- Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Lost in Translation: On the Problem of Data Coding in Penalized Whole Genome Regression with Interactions.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Multivariate GBLUP Improves Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Yield and Fruit Weight in Biparental Populations ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dominance genetic effects are rarely included in pedigree-based genetic evaluation. With the availability of single nucleotide polymorphism markers and the development of genomic evaluation, estimates of dominance genetic effects have become feasible using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). Usually, studies involving additive and dominance genetic effects ignore possible relationships between them. It has been often suggested that the magnitude of functional additive and dominance effects at the quantitative trait loci are related, but there is no existing GBLUP-like approach accounting for such correlation. Wellmann and Bennewitz (2012) showed two ways of considering directional relationships between additive and dominance effects, which they estimated in a Bayesian framework. However, these relationships cannot be fitted at the level of individuals instead of loci in a mixed model, and are not compatible with standard animal or plant breeding software. This comes from a fundamental ambiguity in assigning the reference allele at a given locus. We show that, if there has been selection, assigning the most frequent as the reference allele orients the correlation between functional additive and dominance effects. As a consequence, the most frequent reference allele is expected to have a positive value. We also demonstrate that selection creates negative covariance between genotypic additive and dominance genetic values. For parameter estimation, it is possible to use a combined additive and dominance relationship matrix computed from marker genotypes, and to use standard restricted maximum likelihood algorithms based on an equivalent model. Through a simulation study, we show that such correlations can easily be estimated by mixed model software and that the accuracy of prediction for genetic values is slightly improved if such correlations are used in GBLUP. However, a model assuming uncorrelated effects and fitting orthogonal breeding values and dominant deviations performed similarly for prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.