Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29743098›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2018

Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula.

Tommaso Mauri, Alessandro Galazzi, Filippo Binda, Laura Masciopinto, Nadia Corcione, Eleonora Carlesso, Marta Lazzeri, Elena Spinelli, Daniela Tubiolo, Carlo Alberto Volta and 3 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04934163 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Flow Rates of Postextubation High-flow Nasal Cannula on Extubation Outcome: An Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsHypoxemic Respiratory FailureArmsFlow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 60L/min), Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 40L/min)
NCT05291117 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) Apnoeic Ventilation During Operative Hysteroscopic Procedures Under General Anesthesia: an Observational Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsOxygen, General Anesthesia, Hysteroscopy
NCT05550584 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Oxygen During ProcEdural Sedation for Operative Hysteroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial - HOPE Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2022 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsEndometrium, Hypertrophy, Cervix, Anesthesia, Apnea, PostanestheticArmsTransnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE)., LMA
NCT05688189 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Initial Temperature Setting of High Flow Nasal Cannula in Critically Ill Patients: a Pragmatic Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoRan2023 to 2023Enrolled21ConditionsOxygen TherapyArmsdifferent starting temperature setting of HFNC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effect of lidocaine spray on reliving non-coring needle puncture-related pain in patients with totally implantable venous access port: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tommaso MauriAnesthesia and Critical Care, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro GalazziAnesthesia and Critical Care, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Filippo BindaDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Laura MasciopintoDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Nadia CorcioneDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Eleonora CarlessoAnesthesia and Critical Care, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Marta LazzeriDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Elena SpinelliDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Daniela TubioloDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Carlo Alberto VoltaDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Ileana AdaminiAnesthesia and Critical Care, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Antonio PesentiAnesthesia and Critical Care, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy. antonio.pesenti@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-729X
Giacomo GrasselliAnesthesia and Critical Care, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers up to 60 l/min of humidified air/oxygen blend at a temperature close to that of the human body. In this study, we tested whether higher temperature and flow decrease patient comfort. In more severe patients, instead, we hypothesized that higher flow might be associated with improved comfort.

methodsA prospective, randomized, cross-over study was performed on 40 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) patients (PaO

resultsPatient comfort was reported as significantly higher during steps at the lower temperature (31 °C) in comparison to 37 °C, with the HFNC set at both 30 and 60 l/min (p < 0.0001). Higher flow, however, was not associated with poorer comfort. In the subgroup of patients with clinical FiO

conclusionsHFNC temperature seems to significantly impact the comfort of AHRF patients: for equal flow, lower temperature could be more comfortable. Higher flow does not decrease patient comfort; at variance, it improves comfort in the more severely hypoxemic patient.

Indexed as

TemperatureAdultAgedCannulaCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansHypoxiaIntensive Care UnitsItalyMaleMiddle AgedOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyPatient ComfortProspective StudiesOxygenAcute hypoxemic respiratory failureHigh-flow nasal oxygenNursingPatient comfortSpontaneous breathing

Identifiers

PMID29743098
PMCPMC5941611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.