Trial reportJournal of neurotrauma2018
Amantadine Did Not Positively Impact Cognition in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multi-Site, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of neurotrauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy for Depression after Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: an Umbrella Review.Neuropsychology review · 2023Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Harms of Pharmacological Interventions for Aggression After Traumatic Brain Injury-Systematic Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- The effect of methylphenidate and amantadine co-administration on functional outcome of patients with blunt traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Trial
- Clinical practice guidelines on post-traumatic cognitive impairment: Assessment and remedial measures.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Review
- Advances in Neurorehabilitation: Strategies and Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery.Cureus · 2024Review
- Cognitive outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Rehabilitation strategies.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Review
- A bridge to recovery: Acute amantadine prior to environmental enrichment after brain trauma augments cognitive benefit.Experimental neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Consciousness Disorders; Technical and Ethical Considerations.Neuroethics · 2024Article
- Therapy of traumatic brain injury by modern agents and traditional Chinese medicine.Chinese medicine · 2023Review
- Research progress on pleiotropic neuroprotective drugs for traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Current Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Amantadine: reappraisal of the timeless diamond-target updates and novel therapeutic potentials.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021Review
- Unilateral parietal brain injury increases risk-taking on a rat gambling task.Experimental neurology · 2020Article
- Amantadine Alleviates Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Possibly by Preserving Neurotrophic Factor Expression and Dendritic Arborization in the Hippocampus of Old Rodents.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
- Recent advances in traumatic brain injury.Journal of neurology · 2019Review
- Environmental enrichment and amantadine confer individual but nonadditive enhancements in motor and spatial learning after controlled cortical impact injury.Brain research · 2019Article
- Dose-dependent neurorestorative effects of amantadine after cortical impact injury.Neuroscience letters · 2019Article
- Intranasal delivery systems for traumatic brain injury: Advancements and perspectives.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite limited evidence to support the use of amantadine to enhance cognitive function after traumatic brain injury (TBI), the clinical use for this purpose is highly prevalent and is often based on inferred belief systems. The aim of this study was to assess effect of amantadine on cognition among individuals with a history of TBI and behavioral disturbance using a parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine 100 mg twice-daily versus placebo for 60 days. Included in the study were 119 individuals with two or more neuropsychological measures greater than 1 standard deviation below normative means from a larger study of 168 individuals with chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) and irritability. Cognitive function was measured at treatment days 0, 28, and 60 with a battery of neuropsychological tests. Composite indices were generated: General Cognitive Index (included all measures), a Learning Memory Index (learning/memory measures), and Attention/Processing Speed Index (attention and executive function measures). Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed statistically significant between-group differences favoring the placebo group at day 28 for General Cognitive Index (p = 0.002) and Learning Memory Index (p = 0.001), but not Attention/Processing Speed Index (p = 0.25), whereas no statistically significant between-group differences were found at day 60. There were no statistically significant between-group differences on adverse events. Cognitive function in individuals with chronic TBI is not improved by amantadine 100 mg twice-daily. In the first 28 days of use, amantadine may impede cognitive processing. However, the effect size was small and mean scores for both groups were generally within expectations for persons with history of complicated mild-to-severe TBI, suggesting that changes observed across assessments may not have functional significance. The use of amantadine to enhance cognitive function is not supported by these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.