Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29742717›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Preventable hospitalizations, barriers to care, and disability.

Liliana E Pezzin, Hillary R Bogner, Jibby E Kurichi, Pui L Kwong, Joel E Streim, Dawei Xie, Ling Na, Sean Hennessy

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of County-Level Home Modification Use Across the US.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Home Modifications for Rural Veterans With Disabilities.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liliana E PezzinDepartment of Medicine and Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research (PCOR), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI Department of Family and Medicine & Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training Geriatric Psychiatry Section of the Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Hillary R Bogner
Jibby E Kurichi
Pui L Kwong
Joel E Streim
Dawei Xie
Ling Na
Sean Hennessy

Funding

Ambulatory Care Access and QualityR01HD074756 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AHRQ's Prevention Quality Indicators assume inpatient hospitalizations for certain conditions, referred as ambulatory-care sensitive (ACS) conditions, are potentially preventable and may indicate reduced access to and a lower quality of ambulatory care. Using a cohort drawn from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) linked to Medicare claims, we examined the extent to which barriers to healthcare are associated with ACS hospitalizations and related costs, and whether these associations differ by beneficiaries' disability status. Our results indicate that the regression-adjusted cost of ACS hospitalizations for elderly Medicare beneficiaries with no disabilities was $799. This cost increased six-fold, by $5148, among beneficiaries with mild disability, by $9045 for beneficiaries with moderate disability, by $5513 for those with severe disability, and by $8557 for persons with complete disability (P < 0.001). Persons reporting having foregone or delayed needed medical care because of financial difficulties (+$2082, P = .05), those experiencing low satisfaction with care coordination (+$1714, P = .01), and those reporting low satisfaction with access to care (+$1237, P = .02) also incurred significant excess ACS hospitalization costs relative to persons reporting no such barriers. This pattern held true for those with and without a disability, but were especially marked among persons with no functional limitations. These findings suggest that a better understanding of how public policy might effectively improve care coordination and reduce financial barriers to care is essential to formulating programs that reduce excess hospitalizations among the large and growing number of elderly Medicare beneficiaries.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHospital CostsPersons with DisabilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicareQuality Indicators, Health CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29742717
PMCPMC5959443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.