Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29742683›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Efficiency and adverse events of electronic cigarettes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-compliant article).

Xing Liu, Wan Lu, Sheng Liao, Zhongliang Deng, Zhongrong Zhang, Yun Liu, Weizhong Lu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Electronic Cigarettes and Oral Health.Journal of dental research · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xing LiuThe Department of Orthopedics, The Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital The Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing The Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, The 452 Hospital of PLA, Chengdu The Department of Trauma and Microsurgery, The 324 Hospital of PLA The Department of Urinary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of The Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wan Lu
Sheng Liao
Zhongliang Deng
Zhongrong Zhang
Yun Liu
Weizhong Lu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are a prevalent smoking cessation aid worldwide; however, a consensus regarding their efficacy and safety has yet to be reached.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature from related studies written in English or Chinese and published between January 1, 2003, and July 30, 2017. Eligible studies reporting the number of smokers who reduced or quit smoking and suffered from adverse events after e-cigarette use were selected according to predefined criteria; pertinent data were then extracted for a meta-analysis.

resultsOur search produced 198 articles; of these publications, 14 including 35,665 participants were analyzed. The pooled efficacy rate of e-cigarettes ranged from 48.3% to 58.7% for smoking reduction and from 13.2% to 22.9% for smoking cessation. The pooled rate of adverse events associated with e-cigarettes ranged from 49.1% to 51.6% based on 11 studies including 16,406 participants. The most prevalent adverse events were mouth or throat irritation, anxiety, depressed mood, nausea, and insomnia. No significant differences in overall CO2 exhalation (eCO) levels were observed after e-cigarette use according to the data from 5 studies.

conclusionOur findings suggest that e-cigarettes are moderately effective with regard to smoking reduction and smoking cessation. eCO levels are unreliable for evaluating the efficacy of e-cigarettes. E-cigarette related adverse events frequently occur, especially due to high-dose nicotine-containing cartridges.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHumansSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29742683
PMCPMC5959444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.