Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29742655›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2018

Gabapentin for the Treatment of Vulvodynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Candace S Brown, Gloria A Bachmann, Jim Wan, David C Foster, Gabapentin (GABA) Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01301001 (A Controlled Trial of Gabapentin in Vulvodynia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01301001 nacompletednot on this map

A Controlled Trial of Gabapentin in Vulvodynia: Biological Correlates of Response

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2012 to 2016Enrolled230ConditionsVulvodyniaArmsPlacebo oral capsule, Gabapentin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Vulvodynia (chronic vulval pain).BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Pharmacological Treatments for Localized Provoked Vulvodynia: A Scoping Review.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  9. Evaluation and Treatment of Vulvodynia: State of the Science.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2023
    Review
  10. Vulvodynia: Pain Management Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vulvodynia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Candace S BrownDepartments of Clinical and Translational Science and Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Gloria A Bachmann
Jim Wan
David C Foster
Gabapentin (GABA) Study Group
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

A Controlled Trial of Gabapentin in Vulvodynia: Biological Correlates of ResponseR01HD065740 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI BACHMANN, GLORIA A, BROWN, CANDACE S · 2011 to 2014
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether extended-release gabapentin is more effective than placebo among women with vulvodynia.

methodsIn a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial, gabapentin (1,200-3,000 mg/d) was compared with a placebo. The primary outcome was mean pain intensity (0, no pain at all to 10, worst pain ever) on the tampon test (a standardized tampon insertion and removal test used as a surrogate marker for dyspareunia) during the last 7 days of the maintenance phase. Secondary outcomes included sexual intercourse pain and daily pain. A sample size of 53 provided 90% power to detect a 1-point reduction on the tampon test (.05 level, two-sided) between the two treatment phases.

resultsFrom August 2012 to January 2016, 230 women were screened at three academic institutions and 89 (mean age 37 years; 65% black) were randomized: 45 to gabapentin first and then placebo and 44 to placebo first and then gabapentin. Tampon test pain with gabapentin was not different compared with the placebo (adjusted mean 4.0, 95% CI 3.0-4.9 vs 4.3, 95% CI 3.4-5.2, difference -0.3, 95% CI -0.7 to 0.0; P=.07). Gabapentin also did not improve pain over placebo for sexual intercourse pain (adjusted mean 3.9, 95% CI 2.4-5.3 vs 4.0, 95% CI 2.5-5.4, difference -0.1, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.6; P=.76) and daily pain (adjusted mean 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-3.6 vs 2.9, 95% CI 2.0-3.8, difference -0.2, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.2; P=.36). Subset analyses found that longer pain duration and oral contraceptive nonuse were associated with minimal improvement in tampon test pain with gabapentin.

conclusionIn this cohort, extended-release gabapentin, as compared with a placebo, did not reduce tampon test pain. These data do not support the recommendation of gabapentin alone as treatment for vulvodynia. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01301001.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesicsCross-Over StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsDiagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and GynecologicalDouble-Blind MethodDyspareuniaFemaleGabapentinHumansMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeVulvodyniaAnalgesicsDelayed-Action PreparationsGabapentin

Identifiers

PMID29742655
PMCPMC6020139
OpenAlexW2800491868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.