Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2018
Gabapentin for the Treatment of Vulvodynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01301001 (A Controlled Trial of Gabapentin in Vulvodynia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Controlled Trial of Gabapentin in Vulvodynia: Biological Correlates of Response
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the placebo effect: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis of treatment strategies for vulvodynia.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of gabapentin on sexual function in vulvodynia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Trial
- Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives in vulvodynia: From current evidence to future investigations.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Review
- Genitopelvic pain in racially/ethnically, sexually, and gender/sex minoritized samples in Canada and the United States: a scoping review.Sexual medicine reviews · 2026Article
- Current and future pharmacotherapy for female sexual dysfunction.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Vulvodynia (chronic vulval pain).BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of topical gabapentin in the treatment of vulvodynia: a narrative synthesis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Pharmacological Treatments for Localized Provoked Vulvodynia: A Scoping Review.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023Article
- Evaluation and Treatment of Vulvodynia: State of the Science.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2023Review
- Vulvodynia: Pain Management Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of vestibulodynia: understanding pathophysiology and determining appropriate treatments (vestibulodynia: UPDATe).Annals of medicine · 2022Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of somatocognitive therapy in the management of women with provoked localized vestibulodynia-ProLoVe feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- #ItsNotInYourHead: A Social Media Campaign to Disseminate Information on Provoked Vestibulodynia.Archives of sexual behavior · 2021Article
- Cannabis and Vulvodynia Symptoms: A Preliminary Report.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2020Article
- Vulvodynia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether extended-release gabapentin is more effective than placebo among women with vulvodynia.
methodsIn a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial, gabapentin (1,200-3,000 mg/d) was compared with a placebo. The primary outcome was mean pain intensity (0, no pain at all to 10, worst pain ever) on the tampon test (a standardized tampon insertion and removal test used as a surrogate marker for dyspareunia) during the last 7 days of the maintenance phase. Secondary outcomes included sexual intercourse pain and daily pain. A sample size of 53 provided 90% power to detect a 1-point reduction on the tampon test (.05 level, two-sided) between the two treatment phases.
resultsFrom August 2012 to January 2016, 230 women were screened at three academic institutions and 89 (mean age 37 years; 65% black) were randomized: 45 to gabapentin first and then placebo and 44 to placebo first and then gabapentin. Tampon test pain with gabapentin was not different compared with the placebo (adjusted mean 4.0, 95% CI 3.0-4.9 vs 4.3, 95% CI 3.4-5.2, difference -0.3, 95% CI -0.7 to 0.0; P=.07). Gabapentin also did not improve pain over placebo for sexual intercourse pain (adjusted mean 3.9, 95% CI 2.4-5.3 vs 4.0, 95% CI 2.5-5.4, difference -0.1, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.6; P=.76) and daily pain (adjusted mean 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-3.6 vs 2.9, 95% CI 2.0-3.8, difference -0.2, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.2; P=.36). Subset analyses found that longer pain duration and oral contraceptive nonuse were associated with minimal improvement in tampon test pain with gabapentin.
conclusionIn this cohort, extended-release gabapentin, as compared with a placebo, did not reduce tampon test pain. These data do not support the recommendation of gabapentin alone as treatment for vulvodynia. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01301001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.