ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Analysis of the Precision, Robustness, and Speed of Elastic Resonator Interference Stress Microscopy.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Detection of Cellular Signals at Material Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Highly transparent elastic optical microcavities for interferometric mapping of cell mechanics.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- CRB2 depletion induces YAP signaling and disrupts mechanosensing in podocytes.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Molecular Force Sensors for Biological Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A primer to traction force microscopy.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Review
- KIAA0319 influences cilia length, cell migration and mechanical cell-substrate interaction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Real-time imaging of cellular forces using optical interference.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Elucidating the Biomechanics of Leukocyte Transendothelial Migration by Quantitative Imaging.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics.Nature materials · 2020Article
- Tutorial on laser speckle rheology: technology, applications, and opportunities.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Review
- Direct measurement of vertical forces shows correlation between mechanical activity and proteolytic ability of invadopodia.Science advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Localization-microscopy-based methods are widely used to map the forces that cells apply to their substrates and to study important questions of cellular biomechanics. By contrast, elastic resonator interference stress microscopy (ERISM) uses an interference-based approach, which requires low light intensity and facilitates imaging of cellular forces with extreme precision (down to pN forces) and robustness (e.g., for continuous force monitoring over weeks). Here, the measurement trade-offs and numerical considerations required to optimize the performance of ERISM are described. The crucial parts of the fitting algorithm and the computational tools used to evaluate the data are explained in detail, and the precision and accuracy achievable with ERISM are analyzed. Additional features that can improve the robustness of ERISM further are discussed. The implementation of the analysis algorithm is verified with simulated test data and with experimental data. In addition, an approach to increase the acquisition speed of ERISM by a factor of four compared to the original implementation is described. In combination, these strategies allow us to measure the forces generated by a neural growth cone with high temporal resolution and continuously over several hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.