Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29742396›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2018

How Do We Know when Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy Really Tests Single Bonds?

Keith C Johnson, Wendy E Thomas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy: Experiments, Analysis, and Simulations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. multiSMD - A Python Toolset for Multidirectional Steered Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unique stick-slip crack dynamics of double-network hydrogels under pure-shear loading.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keith C JohnsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Wendy E ThomasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: wendyt@uw.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms for ligand binding by serine-rich adhesins of Gram-positive pathogensR01AI106987 · NIAID · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI IVERSON, T M, SULLAM, PAUL M. · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Conformational dynamics of adhesive bondsR01AI119675 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOKURENKO, EVGENI VENIAMINOVIC, THOMAS, WENDY E · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Biosynthetic and Functional Consequences of von Willebrand Disease MutationsR01HL117639 · NHLBI · BLOODWORKS · PI LOPEZ, JOSE ARON · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117639NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI106987NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI119675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule force spectroscopy makes it possible to measure the mechanical strength of single noncovalent receptor-ligand-type bonds. A major challenge in this technique is to ensure that measurements reflect bonds between single biomolecules because the molecules cannot be directly observed. This perspective evaluates different methodologies for identifying and reducing the contribution of multiple molecule interactions to single-molecule measurements to help the reader design experiments or assess publications in the single-molecule force spectroscopy field. We apply our analysis to the large body of literature that purports to measure the strength of single bonds between biotin and streptavidin as a demonstration that measurements are only reproducible when the most reliable methods for ensuring single molecules are used.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaSingle Molecule ImagingProbability

Identifiers

PMID29742396
PMCPMC5961468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.