Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29742258›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2018

Neurosensory analysis of tooth sensitivity during at-home dental bleaching: a randomized clinical trial.

André Luiz Fraga Briso, Vanessa Rahal, Fernanda Almeida de Azevedo, Marjorie de Oliveira Gallinari, Rafael Simões Gonçalves, Sandra Meira Borghi Frascino, Paulo Henrique Dos Santos, Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

André Luiz Fraga BrisoDepartamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa RahalDepartamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Almeida de AzevedoDepartamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marjorie de Oliveira GallinariDepartamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Simões GonçalvesDepartamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sandra Meira Borghi Frascino
Paulo Henrique Dos SantosDepartamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciano Tavares Angelo CintraDepartamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate dental sensitivity using visual analogue scale, a Computerized Visual Analogue Scale (CoVAS) and a neurosensory analyzer (TSA II) during at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide, with and without potassium oxalate. Materials and Methods Power Bleaching 10% containing potassium oxalate was used on one maxillary hemi-arch of the 25 volunteers, and Opalescence 10% was used on the opposite hemi-arch. Bleaching agents were used daily for 3 weeks. Analysis was performed before treatment, 24 hours later, 7, 14, and 21 days after the start of the treatment, and 7 days after its conclusion. The spontaneous tooth sensitivity was evaluated using the visual analogue scale and the sensitivity caused by a continuous 0°C stimulus was analyzed using CoVAS. The cold sensation threshold was also analyzed using the TSA II. The temperatures obtained were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=5%). Results The data obtained with the other methods were also analyzed. 24 hours, 7 and 14 days before the beginning of the treatment, over 20% of the teeth presented spontaneous sensitivity, the normal condition was restored after the end of the treatment. Regarding the cold sensation temperatures, both products sensitized the teeth (p<0.05) and no differences were detected between the products in each period (p>0.05). In addition, when they were compared using CoVAS, Power Bleaching caused the highest levels of sensitivity in all study periods, with the exception of the 14th day of treatment. Conclusion We concluded that the bleaching treatment sensitized the teeth and the product with potassium oxalate was not able to modulate tooth sensitivity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceCarbamide PeroxideDentin SensitivityFemaleHumansMaleOrotic AcidPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPeroxidesSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTooth BleachingTooth Bleaching AgentsCarbamide PeroxideOrotic AcidPeroxidesTooth Bleaching AgentsUrea

Identifiers

PMID29742258
PMCPMC5933834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.