Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29742123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Diversity and antimicrobial potential in sea anemone and holothurian microbiomes.

Elizabeth León-Palmero, Vanessa Joglar, Pedro A Álvarez, Antonio Martín-Platero, Inmaculada Llamas, Isabel Reche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiome profile of the Antarctic clam Laternula elliptica.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of the Microbiota in Regeneration-Associated Processes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Properties of a New Food Supplement ContainingAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth León-PalmeroDepartamento de Ecología and Instituto del Agua, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Vanessa JoglarDepartamento de Ecología and Instituto del Agua, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Pedro A ÁlvareziMare Natural S.L., Motril, Granada, Spain.
Antonio Martín-PlateroDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Inmaculada LlamasDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Isabel RecheDepartamento de Ecología and Instituto del Agua, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2908-1724
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine invertebrates, as holobionts, contain symbiotic bacteria that coevolve and develop antimicrobial substances. These symbiotic bacteria are an underexplored source of new bioactive molecules to face the emerging antibiotic resistance in pathogens. Here, we explored the antimicrobial activity of bacteria retrieved from the microbiota of two sea anemones (Anemonia sulcata, Actinia equina) and two holothurians (Holothuria tubulosa, Holothuria forskali). We tested the antimicrobial activity of the isolated bacteria against pathogens with interest for human health, agriculture and aquaculture. We isolated 27 strains with antibacterial activity and 12 of these isolates also showed antifungal activity. We taxonomically identified these strains being Bacillus and Vibrio species the most representative producers of antimicrobial substances. Microbiome species composition of the two sea anemones was similar between them but differed substantially of seawater bacteria. In contrast, microbiome species composition of the two holothurian species was different between them and in comparison with the bacteria in holothurian feces and seawater. In all the holobiont microbiomes Bacteroidetes was the predominant phylum. For each microbiome, we determined diversity and the rank-abundance dominance using five fitted models (null, pre-emption, log-Normal, Zipf and Zipf-Mandelbrot). The models with less evenness (i.e. Zipf and Zipf-Mandelblot) showed the best fits in all the microbiomes. Finally, we tracked (using the V4 hypervariable region of 16S rRNA gene) the relative abundance of these 27 isolates with antibacterial activity in the total pool of sequences obtained for the microbiome of each holobiont. Coincidences, although with extremely low frequencies, were detected only in the microbiome of H. forskali. This fact suggests that these isolated bacteria belong to the long tail of rare symbiotic bacteria. Therefore, more and more sophisticated culture techniques are necessary to explore this apparently vast pool of rare symbiontic bacteria and to determine their biotechnological potentiality.

Indexed as

BiodiversityMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaHolothuriaSea AnemonesSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29742123
PMCPMC5942802
OpenAlexW2802355652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.