Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29741735›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2018

Widespread epigenomic, transcriptomic and proteomic differences between hip osteophytic and articular chondrocytes in osteoarthritis.

Julia Steinberg, Roger A Brooks, Lorraine Southam, Sahir Bhatnagar, Theodoros I Roumeliotis, Konstantinos Hatzikotoulas, Eleni Zengini, J Mark Wilkinson, Jyoti S Choudhary, Andrew W McCaskie and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetics in osteoarthritis: Novel spotlight.Journal of cellular physiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia SteinbergWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Roger A BrooksDivision of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Lorraine SouthamWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Sahir BhatnagarLady Davis Research Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Theodoros I RoumeliotisWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Konstantinos HatzikotoulasWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Eleni ZenginiDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
J Mark WilkinsonDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jyoti S ChoudharyWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Andrew W McCaskieDivision of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Eleftheria ZegginiWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBCentre for Human Genetics · GBJewish General Hospital · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify molecular differences between chondrocytes from osteophytic and articular cartilage tissue from OA patients. Methods: We investigated genes and pathways by combining genome-wide DNA methylation, RNA sequencing and quantitative proteomics in isolated primary chondrocytes from the cartilaginous layer of osteophytes and matched areas of low- and high-grade articular cartilage across nine patients with OA undergoing hip replacement surgery. Results: Chondrocytes from osteophytic cartilage showed widespread differences to low-grade articular cartilage chondrocytes. These differences were similar to, but more pronounced than, differences between chondrocytes from osteophytic and high-grade articular cartilage, and more pronounced than differences between high- and low-grade articular cartilage. We identified 56 genes with significant differences between osteophytic chondrocytes and low-grade articular cartilage chondrocytes on all three omics levels. Several of these genes have known roles in OA, including ALDH1A2 and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, which have functional genetic variants associated with OA from genome-wide association studies. An integrative gene ontology enrichment analysis showed that differences between osteophytic and low-grade articular cartilage chondrocytes are associated with extracellular matrix organization, skeletal system development, platelet aggregation and regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade. Conclusion: We present a first comprehensive view of the molecular landscape of chondrocytes from osteophytic cartilage as compared with articular cartilage chondrocytes from the same joints in OA. We found robust changes at genes relevant to chondrocyte function, providing insight into biological processes involved in osteophyte development and thus OA progression.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesChromatography, LiquidDNA MethylationEpigenomicsFemaleHumansMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipProteomicsRNA

Identifiers

PMID29741735
PMCPMC6055583
OpenAlexW2801889913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.