ReviewHuman molecular genetics2018
Genomics and electronic health record systems.
Review in Human molecular genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Network Studies Based on Administrative Health Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Development of a web-based, theory-guided narrative intervention for women at elevated risk for breast cancer.Patient education and counseling · 2023Trial
- The case for integrating genetic counselors into primary care: A paradigm shift for our profession.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Review
- PillHarmonics: An Orchestrated Pharmacogenetics Medication Clinical Decision Support Service.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Molecularly-Guided Cancer Clinical Trial Matching using FHIR and HL7 Clinical Quality Language: A Proof of Concept.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Implementation of a genotyped African population cohort, with virtual follow-up: A feasibility study in the Western Cape Province, South Africa.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
- Challenges of Integrating APOL1 Genetic Test Results into the Electronic Health Record.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Introducing HL7 FHIR Genomics Operations: a developer-friendly approach to genomics-EHR integration.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Environmental scan of family chart linking for genetic cascade screening in a U.S. integrated health system.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Development and implementation of an electronic medical record module to track genetic testing results.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Adolescent perceptions of pharmacogenetic testing.Pharmacogenomics · 2021Article
- Integrating Somatic and Germline Next-Generation Sequencing Into Routine Clinical Oncology Practice.JCO precision oncology · 2021Review
- Electronic health records and polygenic risk scores for predicting disease risk.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from Genomics to Therapeutics: A Framework for Community Practice Integration to Arrive at Personalized Therapy Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- The emerging landscape of health research based on biobanks linked to electronic health records: Existing resources, statistical challenges, and potential opportunities.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
- Healthcare Associated Infections: An Interoperable Infrastructure for Multidrug Resistant Organism Surveillance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Genomic Information for Clinicians in the Electronic Health Record: Lessons Learned From the Clinical Genome Resource Project and the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Translating Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics to the Clinic: Progress in Human and Veterinary Medicine.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several reviews and case reports have described how information derived from the analysis of genomes are currently included in electronic health records (EHRs) for the purposes of supporting clinical decisions. Since the introduction of this new type of information in EHRs is relatively new (for instance, the widespread adoption of EHRs in the United States is just about a decade old), it is not surprising that a myriad of approaches has been attempted, with various degrees of success. EHR systems undergo much customization to fit the needs of health systems; these approaches have been varied and not always generalizable. The intent of this article is to present a high-level view of these approaches, emphasizing the functionality that they are trying to achieve, and not to advocate for specific solutions, which may become obsolete soon after this review is published. We start by broadly defining the end goal of including genomics in EHRs for healthcare and then explaining the various sources of information that need to be linked to arrive at a clinically actionable genomics analysis using a pharmacogenomics example. In addition, we include discussions on open issues and a vision for the next generation systems that integrate whole genome sequencing and EHRs in a seamless fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.