Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29741162›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

The Urinary Sarcosine/Creatinine Ratio is a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker in Prostate Cancer.

Meng Wang, Lihui Zou, Jing Liang, Xin Wang, Dalei Zhang, Yuan Fang, Junhua Zhang, Fei Xiao, Ming Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. ABiology open · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Modern urology perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers.Central European journal of urology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Lihui ZouThe MOH Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jing LiangDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xin WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Dalei ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Yuan FangThe MOH Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Junhua ZhangThe MOH Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Fei XiaoThe MOH Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Ming LiuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China (mainland).
Beijing Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratio in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer, using a sarcosine oxidase assay. MATERIAL AND METHODS Urine samples were obtained from 203 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and 209 patients with prostate cancer. Levels of urinary sarcosine were measured using the sarcosine oxidase method. The urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratios were compared between the group of patients with BPH and the patients with prostate cancer. In the two patients groups, the urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratio was compared with the measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the free/total (F/T) PSA ratio. Correlations between of the urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratio and the Gleason grade and stage of prostate cancer were analyzed. RESULTS There was a significant difference between the urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratio in the BPH group and prostate cancer group (P<0.01), which was independent of serum PSA. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) for the urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratio was significantly higher compared with the serum PSA and the F/T PSA ratio. There was a significant difference in the urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratio in patients with prostate cancer with Gleason score ≤6, 7, and ≥8, and between patients with metastatic and non-metastatic prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS The urinary sarcosine/creatinine ratio was a diagnostic indicator of prostate cancer, for patients with a serum PSA level <10 ng/ml, and correlated with the Gleason score and with the presence of metastases (stage) of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCreatinineHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsROC CurveSarcosineBiomarkers, TumorCreatinineSarcosine

Identifiers

PMID29741162
PMCPMC5967288
OpenAlexW2801110533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.