Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740787›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018

Healthcare at the Crossroads: The Need to Shape an Organizational Culture of Humanistic Teaching and Practice.

Elizabeth A Rider, MaryAnn C Gilligan, Lars G Osterberg, Debra K Litzelman, Margaret Plews-Ogan, Amy B Weil, Dana W Dunne, Janet P Hafler, Natalie B May, Arthur R Derse and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. The Digital Era and the Future of Pediatric Surgery.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A RiderDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
MaryAnn C GilliganDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Lars G OsterbergDepartment of Medicine (Teaching), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Debra K LitzelmanDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Margaret Plews-OganDivision of General, Geriatric, Palliative and Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Amy B WeilDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Dana W DunneDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Janet P HaflerDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Natalie B MayDivision of General, Geriatric, Palliative and Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Arthur R DerseCenter for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Richard M FrankelDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
William T BranchDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. Wbranch@emory.edu.
University of Virginia · USYale University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USCal Humanities · USEmory University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineMedical College of Wisconsin · USStanford University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in the organization of medical practice have impeded humanistic practice and resulted in widespread physician burnout and dissatisfaction.

objectiveTo identify organizational factors that promote or inhibit humanistic practice of medicine by faculty physicians.

designFrom January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016, faculty from eight US medical schools were asked to write reflectively on two open-ended questions regarding institutional-level motivators and impediments to humanistic practice and teaching within their organizations.

participantsSixty eight of the 92 (74%) study participants who received the survey provided written responses. All subjects who were sent the survey had participated in a year-long small-group faculty development program to enhance humanistic practice and teaching. As humanistic leaders, subjects should have insights into motivating and inhibiting factors. APPROACH: Participants' responses were analyzed using the constant comparative method. KEY

resultsMotivators included an organizational culture that enhances humanism, which we judged to be the overarching theme. Related themes included leadership supportive of humanistic practice, responsibility to role model humanism, organized activities that promote humanism, and practice structures that facilitate humanism. Impediments included top down organizational culture that inhibits humanism, along with related themes of non-supportive leadership, time and bureaucratic pressures, and non-facilitative practice structures.

conclusionsWhile healthcare has evolved rapidly, efforts to counteract the negative effects of changes in organizational and practice environments have largely focused on cultivating humanistic attributes in individuals. Our findings suggest that change at the organizational level is at least equally important. Physicians in our study described the characteristics of an organizational culture that supports and embraces humanism. We offer suggestions for organizational change that keep humanistic and compassionate patient care as its central focus.

Indexed as

HumanismOrganizational CultureAdultBurnout, ProfessionalDelivery of Health CareFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingburnoutcompassionate healthcarefaculty developmenthumanismleadershiporganizational culturevalues

Identifiers

PMID29740787
PMCPMC6025655
OpenAlexW2799308912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.