Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740753›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2018

Facial Expression Enhances Emotion Perception Compared to Vocal Prosody: Behavioral and fMRI Studies.

Heming Zhang, Xuhai Chen, Shengdong Chen, Yansong Li, Changming Chen, Quanshan Long, Jiajin Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Facial Emotion Recognition and its Associations With Psychological Well-Being Across Four Schizotypal Dimensions: a Cross-Sectional Study.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heming ZhangKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of the Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Xuhai ChenKey Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Psychology in Shaanxi Province, School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, China.
Shengdong ChenKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of the Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Yansong LiDepartment of Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9080-507X
Changming ChenSchool of Educational Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, 464000, China.
Quanshan LongKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of the Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Jiajin YuanKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of the Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China. yuanjiajin168@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-2230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial and vocal expressions are essential modalities mediating the perception of emotion and social communication. Nonetheless, currently little is known about how emotion perception and its neural substrates differ across facial expression and vocal prosody. To clarify this issue, functional MRI scans were acquired in Study 1, in which participants were asked to discriminate the valence of emotional expression (angry, happy or neutral) from facial, vocal, or bimodal stimuli. In Study 2, we used an affective priming task (unimodal materials as primers and bimodal materials as target) and participants were asked to rate the intensity, valence, and arousal of the targets. Study 1 showed higher accuracy and shorter response latencies in the facial than in the vocal modality for a happy expression. Whole-brain analysis showed enhanced activation during facial compared to vocal emotions in the inferior temporal-occipital regions. Region of interest analysis showed a higher percentage signal change for facial than for vocal anger in the superior temporal sulcus. Study 2 showed that facial relative to vocal priming of anger had a greater influence on perceived emotion for bimodal targets, irrespective of the target valence. These findings suggest that facial expression is associated with enhanced emotion perception compared to equivalent vocal prosodies.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionSocial PerceptionAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexEmotionsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPsychomotor PerformanceSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultEmotion perceptionFacial expressionfMRIModalityVocal prosody

Identifiers

PMID29740753
PMCPMC6129238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.