ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2018
Tomosynthesis implementation with adaptive online calibration on clinical C-arm systems.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- RoboCT: The State and Current Challenges of Industrial Twin Robotic CT Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Feature-based CBCT self-calibration for arbitrary trajectories.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Metal-Tolerant Noncircular Orbit Design and Implementation on Robotic C-Arm Systems.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2020Article
- Online mobile C-arm calibration using inertial sensors: a preliminary study in order to achieve CBCT.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- New Calibrator with Points Distributed Conical Helically for Online Calibration of C-Arm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems offer physicians crucial 3D and 2D imaging capabilities during interventions. However, certain medical applications only require very specific information from the CBCTs (e.g., determination of the position of high-contrast objects). In diagnostics, tomosynthesis techniques can be used in these cases to minimize dose exposure. Therefore, integrating such techniques on CBCT systems could also be beneficial for interventions. In this paper, we investigate the performance of our implementation of circular tomosynthesis on a CBCT device.
methodsThe tomosynthesis scan trajectory is realized with step-and-shoot on a clinical C-arm device. The online calibration algorithm uses conventionally acquired 3D CBCT of the scanned object as prior knowledge to correct the imaging geometries. The online calibration algorithm was compared to an offline calibration to test its performance. A ball bearing phantom was used to evaluate the reconstructions with respect to geometric distortions. The evaluation was done for three different scenarios to test the robustness of our tomosynthesis implementation against object deviations (e.g., pen) and different object positioning.
resultsThe circular tomosynthesis was tested on a ball bearing and an anthropomorphic phantom. The results show that the calibration is robust against isocenter shifts and object deviations in the CBCT. All reconstructions used 100 projections and displayed limited angle artifacts. The accuracy of the positions and shapes of high-contrast objects were, however, determined precisely. (The maximal center position deviation is 0.31 mm.)
conclusionFor medical procedures that primarily determine the precise position of high-contrast objects, circular tomosynthesis could offer an approach to reduce dose exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29740752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.