Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740733›Full record

Trial reportJournal of youth and adolescence2018

Modification of Housing Mobility Experimental Effects on Delinquency and Educational Problems: Middle Adolescence as a Sensitive Period.

Nicole M Schmidt, Marvin D Krohn, Theresa L Osypuk

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole M SchmidtMinnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, 225 19th Avenue South, 50 Willey Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. schmidtn@umn.edu.
Marvin D KrohnDepartment of Sociology and Criminology & Law, University of Florida, P.O. Box 117330, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Theresa L OsypukDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S 2nd St Room 300 West Bank Office Building, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Spatial Analysis CoreR24HD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI RUGGLES, STEVE · 2001 to 2016
$4.1M
Moderators and mediators of housing mobility effects on youth risky behaviorsR03HD082679 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SCHMIDT, NICOLE MARIE · 2015 to 2016
$125k
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R03HD082679NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD082679NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residential mobility is one documented stressor contributing to higher delinquency and worse educational outcomes. Sensitive period life course models suggest that certain developmental stages make individuals more susceptible to the effects of an exposure, like residential mobility, on outcomes. However, most prior research is observational, and has not examined heterogeneity across age or gender that may inform sensitive periods, even though it may have important implications for the etiology of adolescent development. Moreover, there are important translational implications for identifying the groups most vulnerable to residential mobility to inform how to buffer adverse effects of moving. In this study, low-income families were randomized to residential mobility out of public housing into lower poverty neighborhoods using a rental subsidy voucher ("experimental voucher condition"), and were compared to control families remaining in public housing. The sample was comprised of 2829 youth (51% female; 62% Non-Hispanic Black, 31% Hispanic, 7% other race). At baseline, youth ranged from 5 to 16 years old. This study hypothesized that random assignment to the housing voucher condition would generate harmful effects on delinquency and educational problems, compared to the control group, among boys who were older at baseline. The results confirmed this hypothesis: random assignment to the experimental voucher condition generating residential mobility caused higher delinquency among boys who were 13-16 years old at baseline, compared to same-age, in-place public housing controls. However, residential mobility did not affect delinquency among girls regardless of age, or among boys who were 5-12 years old at baseline. The pattern of results for educational problems was similar but weaker. Families with teenage boys are particularly vulnerable to residential transitions. Incorporating additional supports into housing programs may help low-income, urban families to successfully transition to lower poverty neighborhoods.

Indexed as

Population DynamicsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansJuvenile DelinquencyLearning DisabilitiesMalePovertyPublic HousingResidence CharacteristicsSocial WelfareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29740733
PMCPMC6222002
OpenAlexW2802767640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.