ArticleEJNMMI research2018
Computer-aided diagnosis for (
Article in EJNMMI research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Clinician Diagnostic Performance With Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Novel applications of machine learning and computational neuroscience models to neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease and related disorders.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Mining imaging and clinical data with machine learning approaches for the diagnosis and early detection of Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Review
- Impact of age and sex correction on the diagnostic performance of dopamine transporter SPECT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Impact of the size of the normal database on the performance of the specific binding ratio in dopamine transporter SPECT.EJNMMI physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor (
resultsThe performance of all reporters demonstrated a degree of variability when analysing images through visual analysis alone. However, inclusion of CADx improved consistency between reporters, for both clinical and research data. The introduction of CADx increased the accuracy of the radiologists when reporting (unfamiliar) research images but had less impact on the clinical scientist and caused no significant change in accuracy for the clinical data.
conclusionsThe outcomes for this study indicate the value of CADx as a diagnostic aid in the clinic and encourage future development for more refined incorporation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.