ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2018
Real-world virological efficacy and safety of elbasvir and grazoprevir in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Japan.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sofosbuvir plus velpatasvir treatment for hepatitis C virus in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a Japanese real-world multicenter study.Journal of gastroenterology · 2021Trial
- Efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment for Chinese patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir in US Veterans with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1b Infection.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2020Article
- A machine learning-based treatment prediction model using whole genome variants of hepatitis C virus.PloS one · 2020Article
- Natural history of liver-related disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: An analysis using a Markov chain model.Journal of medical virology · 2019Article
- Real-world efficacy of elbasvir and grazoprevir for hepatitis C virus (genotype 1): A nationwide, multicenter study by the Japanese Red Cross Hospital Liver Study Group.Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology · 2019Article
- Real-world virological efficacy and safety of daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Japan.Journal of gastroenterology · 2019Article
- The Successful Retreatment with Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir of Genotype 1 or 2 HCV-infected Hemodialysis Patients who Failed to Respond to NS5A and Protease Inhibitor Treatment.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2019Article
- Real-world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018Article
- Current Status of Direct Acting Antiviral Agents against Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Pakistan.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe real-world virological efficacy and safety of an interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy with elbasvir (EBR) and grazoprevir (GZR) were evaluated in Japanese patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1.
methodsThe rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) and safety were analyzed in patients who started the EBR/GZR regimen between November 2016 and July 2017. SVR rates were compared based on patient baseline characteristics.
resultsOverall, 371 of 381 patients (97.4%) achieved SVR. Multivariate analysis identified a history of failure to IFN-free DAA therapy and the presence of double resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in HCV non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) as factors significantly associated with failure to EBR/GZR treatment. The SVR rates of patients with a history of IFN-free DAA therapy and those with double RASs were 55.6 and 63.6%, respectively. In all other subpopulations, the SVR rates were more than 90%. There were no severe adverse events associated with the treatment.
conclusionsThe EBR/GZR regimen yielded high virological efficacy with acceptable safety. Patients with a history of failure to IFN-free DAA therapy or with double RASs in HCV-NS5A remained difficult to treat with this regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29740665What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.