Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740597›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Unique genetic cassettes in a

Tinggang Li, Chen Zhang, Kun-Lin Yang, Jianzhong He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The potential of native and engineered Clostridia for biomass biorefining.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Structural and Biochemical Analyses of the Butanol Dehydrogenase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Metabolic engineering ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tinggang LiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-639X
Chen ZhangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576.
Kun-Lin YangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576.
Jianzhong HeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576.ORCID 0000-0003-1895-6628
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for cellulosic biofuels is on the rise because of the anticipation for sustainable energy and less greenhouse gas emissions in the future. However, production of cellulosic biofuels, especially cellulosic butanol, has been hampered by the lack of potent microbes that are capable of converting cellulosic biomass into biofuels. We report a wild-type

Identifiers

PMID29740597
PMCPMC5938282
OpenAlexW2791403143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.