ReviewFrontiers in psychology2018
Human Consciousness: Where Is It From and What Is It for.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awareness impairment in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia: a systematic MRI review.Journal of neurology · 2023Pooled it
- A philosophical treatise on information, consciousness, and the architecture of perceived reality.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with median nerve stimulation on CRS-R in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness after cerebral hemorrhage: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Homeostatic plasticity in patients with disorders of consciousness detected by combined stimulation: a study protocol.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The Constrained Disorder Principle May Account for Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Art and Perception: Using Empirical Aesthetics in Research on Consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Consciousness Beyond Neural Fields: Expanding the Possibilities of What Has Not Yet Happened.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Giving Up on Consciousness as the Ghost in the Machine.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Evolution of Social Beliefs 1960-2016 in the United States and Its Influence on Empathy and Prosocial Expression in Medicine.Advances in medical education and practice · 2020Article
- Neurophysiological predictors of full clinical consciousness recovery in patients with DoC: a retrospective evaluation of the DoC-NP Score.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consciousness is not a process in the brain but a kind of behavior that, of course, is controlled by the brain like any other behavior. Human consciousness emerges on the interface between three components of animal behavior: communication, play, and the use of tools. These three components interact on the basis of anticipatory behavioral control, which is common for all complex forms of animal life. All three do not exclusively distinguish our close relatives, i.e., primates, but are broadly presented among various species of mammals, birds, and even cephalopods; however, their particular combination in humans is unique. The interaction between communication and play yields symbolic games, most importantly language; the interaction between symbols and tools results in human praxis. Taken together, this gives rise to a mechanism that allows a creature, instead of performing controlling actions overtly, to play forward the corresponding behavioral options in a "second reality" of objectively (by means of tools) grounded symbolic systems. The theory possesses the following properties: (1) It is anti-reductionist and anti-eliminativist, and yet, human consciousness is considered as a purely natural (biological) phenomenon. (2) It avoids epiphenomenalism and indicates in which conditions human consciousness has evolutionary advantages, and in which it may even be disadvantageous. (3) It allows to easily explain the most typical features of consciousness, such as objectivity, seriality and limited resources, the relationship between consciousness and explicit memory, the feeling of conscious agency, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.