Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740131›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes.

Olivier Larouche, Miriam L Zelditch, Richard Cloutier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cranial modularity drives phenotypic diversification and adaptive radiation of Antarctic icefishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Integration drives rapid phenotypic evolution in flatfishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Constraints on the Ecomorphological Convergence of Zooplanktivorous Butterflyfishes.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  16. A comparison of metrics for quantifying cranial suture complexity.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivier LaroucheDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29631, USA. olarouc@g.clemson.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0335-0682
Miriam L ZelditchMuseum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5006-6679
Richard CloutierLaboratoire de Recherche en Paléontologie et Biologie évolutive, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, G5L 3A1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modularity is considered a prerequisite for the evolvability of biological systems. This is because in theory, individual modules can follow quasi-independent evolutionary trajectories or evolve at different rates compared to other aspects of the organism. This may influence the potential of some modules to diverge, leading to differences in disparity. Here, we investigated this relationship between modularity, rates of morphological evolution and disparity using a phylogenetically diverse sample of ray-finned fishes. We compared the support for multiple hypotheses of evolutionary modularity and asked if the partitions delimited by the best-fitting models were also characterized by the highest evolutionary rate differentials. We found that an evolutionary module incorporating the dorsal, anal and paired fins was well supported by the data, and that this module evolves more rapidly and consequently generates more disparity than other modules. This suggests that modularity may indeed promote morphological disparity through differences in evolutionary rates across modules.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimal FinsAnimalsFishesMorphogenesisPhenotypePhylogenySeafood

Identifiers

PMID29740131
PMCPMC5940925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.