Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Similar but separate systems underlie perceptual bistability in vision and audition.

Susan L Denham, Dávid Farkas, Raymond van Ee, Mihaela Taranu, Zsuzsanna Kocsis, Marina Wimmer, David Carmel, István Winkler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susan L DenhamUniversity of Plymouth, Cognition Institute and School of Psychology, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. sdenham@plymouth.a.cuk.ORCID 0000-0002-0988-5672
Dávid FarkasInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre of Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1117, Budapest, Magyartudósok körútja 2, Hungary.
Raymond van EeRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Biophysics/85 PO Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mihaela TaranuUniversity of Plymouth, Cognition Institute and School of Psychology, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
Zsuzsanna KocsisInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre of Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1117, Budapest, Magyartudósok körútja 2, Hungary.
Marina WimmerUniversity of Plymouth, Cognition Institute and School of Psychology, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
David CarmelUniversity of Edinburgh, Department of Psychology, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.
István WinklerInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre of Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1117, Budapest, Magyartudósok körútja 2, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-6151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of perceptual bistability, the phenomenon in which perception switches between different interpretations of an unchanging stimulus, are characterised by very similar properties across a wide range of qualitatively different paradigms. This suggests that perceptual switching may be triggered by some common source. However, it is also possible that perceptual switching may arise from a distributed system, whose components vary according to the specifics of the perceptual experiences involved. Here we used a visual and an auditory task to determine whether individuals show cross-modal commonalities in perceptual switching. We found that individual perceptual switching rates were significantly correlated across modalities. We then asked whether perceptual switching arises from some central (modality-) task-independent process or from a more distributed task-specific system. We found that a log-normal distribution best explained the distribution of perceptual phases in both modalities, suggestive of a combined set of independent processes causing perceptual switching. Modality- and/or task-dependent differences in these distributions, and lack of correlation with the modality-independent central factors tested (ego-resiliency, creativity, and executive function), also point towards perceptual switching arising from a distributed system of similar but independent processes.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionExecutive FunctionFemaleHearingHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeVision, OcularVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29740086
PMCPMC5940790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.