Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740081›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The role of pH on the biological struvite production in digested sludge dewatering liquors.

Francisco Simoes, Peter Vale, Tom Stephenson, Ana Soares

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco SimoesCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK.
Peter ValeSevern Trent Water Limited, Severn Trent Centre, 2 St John's Street, Coventry, CV1 2LZ, UK.
Tom StephensonCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK.
Ana SoaresCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK. a.soares@cranfield.ac.uk.
Cranfield University · GBSevern Trent (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Struvite production mediated by bacteria has opened up a new route for phosphorus recovery from wastewater streams but its application to digested sludge dewatering liquors is not yet well understood. This study investigates the growth and biological struvite production of selected bacteria in wastewater liquors with pHs between 5.7 to 9.1. The bacterial growth was assessed through flow cytometry. Bacillus pumilus, Halobacterium salinarum and Brevibacterium antiquum remained viable at pHs between 5.7 to 9.1 but B. antiquum was able to grow at pHs between 7.3 to 7.8. Further analysis allowed the identification of crystals as struvite in tests between pH 7.3 to 8.3. All strains were capable of producing struvite at a range of pHs, but the highest production of 135-198 mg/L was observed for pHs between 7.3 to 8.3. At pHs > 8.3, precipitation of struvite and calcium compounds was observed in inoculated and non-inoculated tests. This study demonstrates that biological struvite production can occur at a wide range of pHs, hence significantly different from chemical struvite precipitation that occurs at pH > 8.3, making it a potentially viable process for phosphorus recovery as struvite from wastewater streams and sludge liquors without strict pH control.

Indexed as

Bacillus pumilusBrevibacteriumHalobacterium salinarumHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsPhosphorusStruviteWastewaterPhosphorusStruviteWastewater

Identifiers

PMID29740081
PMCPMC5940904
OpenAlexW2802673588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.