Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29740065›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Comparison of first-line and second-line terlipressin versus sole norepinephrine in fulminant ovine septic shock.

Tim G Kampmeier, Philip H Arnemann, Michael Hessler, Laura M Seidel, Karsten Becker, Andrea Morelli, Sebastian W Rehberg, Christian Ertmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim G KampmeierDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. kampmeier@uni-muenster.de.
Philip H ArnemannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Michael HesslerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Laura M SeidelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Karsten BeckerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6391-1341
Andrea MorelliDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Rome, "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Sebastian W RehbergDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Christian ErtmerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DESapienza University of Rome · ITUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines suggest the use of vasopressin in case of catecholamine-refractory septic shock. Terlipressin (TP) as a V

Indexed as

AnimalsCatecholaminesHemodynamicsKidneyNorepinephrinePeritoneal LavageSheep, DomesticShock, SepticTerlipressinVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsCatecholaminesNorepinephrineTerlipressinVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressins

Identifiers

PMID29740065
PMCPMC5940827
OpenAlexW2801188401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.