Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739984›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma differ in immune response, protein translation efficiency and metabolism.

Tian Du, Li Zhu, Kevin M Levine, Nilgun Tasdemir, Adrian V Lee, Dario A A Vignali, Bennett Van Houten, George C Tseng, Steffi Oesterreich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prospective study onBritish journal of cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptomic Insights into Lobular Breast Cancer Biology and Patient Outcomes: Analysis of the MINDACT Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pitfalls in the Histological Diagnosis of Morphologic Variants of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tian DuWomens Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Li ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Kevin M LevineWomens Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Nilgun TasdemirWomens Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Adrian V LeeWomens Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Dario A A VignaliDepartment of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Tumor Microenvironment Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA.
Bennett Van HoutenDepartment of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
George C TsengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Steffi OesterreichWomens Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. oesterreichs@upmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2537-6923
University of Pittsburgh · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Combination FGFR4 and ER-Targeted Therapy for Invasive Lobular CarcinomaF30CA203154 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEVINE, KEVIN MAX · 2017 to 2020
$170k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA203154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histological subtype of breast cancer following invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). ILC differs from IDC in a number of histological and clinical features, such as single strand growth, difficulty in detection, and frequent late recurrences. To understand the molecular pathways involved in the clinical characteristics of ILC, we compared the gene expression profiles of luminal A ILC and luminal A IDC using data from TCGA and utilized samples from METABRIC as a validation data set. Top pathways that were significantly enriched in ILC were related to immune response. ILC exhibited a higher activity of almost all types of immune cells based on cell type-specific signatures compared to IDC. Conversely, pathways that were less enriched in ILC were related to protein translation and metabolism, which we functionally validated in cell lines. The higher immune activity uncovered in our study highlights the currently unexplored potential of a response to immunotherapy in a subset of patients with ILC. Furthermore, the lower rates of protein translation and metabolism - known features of tumor dormancy - may play a role in the late recurrences of ILC and lower detection rate in mammography and PET scanning.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAgedAtlases as TopicBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanHumansImmune SystemImmunotherapyLymphatic MetastasisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMiddle AgedNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29739984
PMCPMC5940770
OpenAlexW2805975450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.