ArticleThe oncologist2018
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Register in the Frame of the Italian Compassionate Use Program.
Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020Trial
- A prospective observational study of treatment sequencing with regorafenib and FTD/TPI in metastatic colorectal cancer: The OSERO study.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- The Danish randomized trial of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival andESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Trifluridine/tipiracil and survival in mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Management of Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Review Encompassing Geriatric Assessment.Cancers · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of anJCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Rechallenge therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Later lines of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: real-world data from a setting with barriers to access cancer therapies.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Long-Term Progression-Free Survival of a Pre-Treated Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Trifluridine/Tipiracil.Chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Tas-102 for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2023Article
- Effectiveness, safety, and prognostic factors of trifluridine/tipiracil for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- The role of biomarker in later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Key Prognostic Factors Create a Composite Risk Score to Stratify Patients into High- and Low-Treatment Benefit Groups: A Multicenter, Retrospective Data Analysis of 84 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib as Part of the CORRECT and CONSIGN Trials.Oncology research and treatment · 2023Observational
- Trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Article
- Real-World Activity and Safety of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2022Observational
- Article
- Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil beyond the Second Line: A Multicenter Retrospective Study from Saudi Arabia.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Effect of neutropenia on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Early Clinical Experience with Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The ROS Study.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTAS-102 is indicated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, available therapies. Given the complete inefficacy in half of patients, the lack of predictive factors, the palliative setting, and the financial and clinical toxicity, optimizing the cost-benefit ratio is crucial. The "ColonLife" nomogram allows an estimate of the 12-week life expectancy of patients with refractory mCRC. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe collected data from patients treated at eight Italian centers in the compassionate use program. Baseline characteristics of patients who were or were not progression free at 6 months were compared. The discriminative ability of the ColonLife nomogram was assessed. Among patients who received both TAS-102 and regorafenib, clinical outcomes of the two sequences were compared.
resultsThis study included 341 patients. Six (2%) and 93 (27%) patients achieved response and disease stabilization, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months with an estimated 6-month PFS rate of 19%; the median overall survival (OS) was 6.2 months. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0, normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and a time from the diagnosis of metastatic disease of >18 months were independently associated with higher chances of a patient being progression free at 6 months. The discriminative ability of ColonLife was confirmed. Among 121 patients who received both regorafenib and TAS-102, no differences in first or second PFS or OS were reported between the two sequences.
conclusionOne out of five patients achieves clinical benefit with TAS-102. ECOG PS, LDH, and time from diagnosis of metastatic disease may help to identify these patients. Excluding patients with very short life expectancy appears a reasonable approach. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Improving the cost-efficacy ratio of TAS-102 in metastatic colorectal cancer is needed to spare useless toxicities in a definitely palliative setting. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and time from the diagnosis of metastatic disease may help to identify patients more likely to achieve benefit. Properly designed prognostic tools (i.e., the "ColonLife" nomogram) may enable excluding from further treatments patients with very limited life expectancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.