Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739891›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Quantitative assessment of prefrontal cortex in humans relative to nonhuman primates.

Chad J Donahue, Matthew F Glasser, Todd M Preuss, James K Rilling, David C Van Essen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolutionary implications ofBrain communications · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chad J DonahueDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; donahuec@wustl.edu vanessen@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-7892
Matthew F GlasserDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Todd M PreussDivision of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329.
James K RillingCenter for Translational Social Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329.
David C Van EssenDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; donahuec@wustl.edu vanessen@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-4721

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
RECONSTRUCTIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF CEREBRAL CORTEXR01MH060974 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 1999 to 2024
$12.7M
SOCIAL COGNITION AND EMOTIONAL AGING IN PRIMATESP01AG026423 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HU, XIAOPING P · 2007 to 2011
$11.6M
21ST CENTURY IMAGING SCIENCES: GRADUATE STUDENT TRAININGT32EB014855 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPH P CULVER, JOSEPH A O'SULLIVAN · 2012 to 2026
$3.1M
A National Chimpanzee Brain ResourceR24NS092988 · NINDS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWOOD, CHESTER · 2015 to 2018
$969k
Non-invasive Multi-modal Parcellation of the Human Cerebral CortexF30MH097312 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GLASSER, MATTHEW FREDERICK · 2012 to 2014
$105k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026423NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB014855NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH097312NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060974NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS092988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have the largest cerebral cortex among primates. The question of whether association cortex, particularly prefrontal cortex (PFC), is disproportionately larger in humans compared with nonhuman primates is controversial: Some studies report that human PFC is relatively larger, whereas others report a more uniform PFC scaling. We address this controversy using MRI-derived cortical surfaces of many individual humans, chimpanzees, and macaques. We present two parcellation-based PFC delineations based on cytoarchitecture and function and show that a previously used morphological surrogate (cortex anterior to the genu of the corpus callosum) substantially underestimates PFC extent, especially in humans. We find that the proportion of cortical gray matter occupied by PFC in humans is up to 1.9-fold greater than in macaques and 1.2-fold greater than in chimpanzees. The disparity is even more prominent for the proportion of subcortical white matter underlying the PFC, which is 2.4-fold greater in humans than in macaques and 1.7-fold greater than in chimpanzees.

Indexed as

Anatomy, ComparativeAnimalsFemaleHumansMacacaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroanatomyPan troglodytesPrefrontal Cortexchimpanzeecortical parcellationevolutionneuroanatomyprefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID29739891
PMCPMC5984508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.