ArticleBMJ open2018
Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- The development and comparative effectiveness of a patient-centered pathology report for breast cancer care: a randomized clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Barriers and solutions for healthcare professionals to involve patients as partners in oncology research: Project RISE.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Assessing the Capability of Large Language Models for Navigation of the Australian Health Care System: Comparative Study.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Starting with the End in Mind: Recommendations to Optimize Implementation of a Novel TBI Classification from the 2024 NINDS TBI Classification and Nomenclature Workshop's Knowledge to Practice Working Group.Journal of neurotrauma · 2025Article
- Virtual Simulation Tools for Communication Skills Training in Health Care Professionals: Literature Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Review
- Bridging the digital divide: Enhancing doctor-patient communication through digital media platforms.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- [Communication as a strategic tool for person-centered care].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2024Article
- Prioritising research funding for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Australia.Journal of public health policy · 2023Review
- Quick prioritization of Cochrane reviews on benign conditions of the prostate.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2023Article
- Kidney health for all: Bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2022Article
- Kidney health for all: bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
- Kidney Health For All: Bridging the Gap in Kidney Health Education and Literacy.Kidney medicine · 2022Article
- Kidney Health for All: Bridging the Gap in Kidney Health Education and Literacy.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Engaging veteran stakeholders to identify patient-centred research priorities for optimizing implementation of lung cancer screening.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Kidney health for all: bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022Article
- Kidney Health for All: Bridging the Gap in Kidney Health Education and Literacy.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- Kidney Health for All: Bridging the Gap in Kidney Health Education and Literacy.American journal of nephrology · 2022Article
- Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify research priorities of consumers and other stakeholders to inform Cochrane Reviews in 'health communication and participation' (including such concepts as patient experience, shared decision-making and health literacy).
settingInternational.
participantsWe included anyone with an interest in health communication and participation. Up to 151 participants (18-80 years; 117 female) across 12 countries took part, including 48 consumers (patients, carers, consumer representatives) and 75 professionals (health professionals, policymakers, researchers) (plus 25 people who identified as both).
designSurvey.
methodsWe invited people to submit their research ideas via an online survey open for 4 weeks. Using inductive thematic analysis, we generated priority research topics, then classified these into broader themes.
resultsParticipants submitted 200 research ideas, which we grouped into 21 priority topics. Key research priorities included: insufficient consumer involvement in research (19 responses), 'official' health information is contradictory and hard to understand (18 responses), communication/coordination breakdowns in health services (15 responses), health information provision a low priority for health professionals (15 responses), insufficient eliciting of patient preferences (14 responses), health services poorly understand/implement patient-centred care (14 responses), lack of holistic care impacting healthcare quality and safety (13 responses) and inadequate consumer involvement in service design (11 responses). These priorities encompassed acute and community health settings, with implications for policy and research. Priority populations of interest included people from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, carers, and people with low educational attainment, or mental illness. Most frequently suggested interventions focused on training and cultural change activities for health services and health professionals.
conclusionsConsumers and other stakeholders want research addressing structural and cultural challenges in health services (eg, lack of holistic, patient-centred, culturally safe care) and building health professionals' communication skills. Solutions should be devised in partnership with consumers, and focus on the needs of vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.